Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair

Open Access

Medical therapy of stricturing Crohn’s disease: what the gut can learn from other organs - a systematic review

Contributed equally
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair20147:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-1536-7-5

Received: 3 January 2014

Accepted: 6 March 2014

Published: 29 March 2014

Abstract

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic remitting and relapsing disease. Fibrostenosing complications such as intestinal strictures, stenosis and ultimately obstruction are some of its most common long-term complications. Despite recent advances in the pathophysiological understanding of CD and a significant improvement of anti-inflammatory therapeutics, medical therapy for stricturing CD is still inadequate. No specific anti-fibrotic therapy exists and the incidence rate of strictures has essentially remained unchanged. Therefore, the current therapy of established fibrotic strictures comprises mainly endoscopic dilation as well as surgical approaches. However, these treatment options are associated with major complications as well as high recurrence rates. Thus, a specific anti-fibrotic therapy for CD is urgently needed. Importantly, there is now a growing body of evidence for prevention as well as effective medical treatment of fibrotic diseases of other organs such as the skin, lung, kidney and liver. In face of the similarity of molecular mechanisms of fibrogenesis across these organs, translation of therapeutic approaches from other fibrotic diseases to the intestine appears to be a promising treatment strategy. In particular transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) neutralization, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors, blockade of components of the renin-angiotensin system, IL-13 inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have emerged as potential drug candidates for anti-fibrotic therapy and may retard progression or even reverse established intestinal fibrosis. However, major challenges have to be overcome in the translation of novel anti-fibrotics into intestinal fibrosis therapy, such as the development of appropriate biomarkers that predict the development and accurately monitor therapeutic responses. Future clinical studies are a prerequisite to evaluate the optimal timing for anti-fibrotic treatment approaches, to elucidate the best routes of application, and to evaluate the potential of drug candidates to reach the ultimate goal: the prevention or reversal of established fibrosis and strictures in CD patients.

Keywords

Crohn’s diseaseIntestinal fibrosisOrgan fibrosisAnti-fibrotic agents

Methods

Literature search and data selection

A comprehensive literature search was performed to assess all relevant citations found in Embase, Medline (service of the US National Library of Medicine (NLM) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH)) and the Cochrane Library for the following key words: (‘Crohn’s disease (CD’) OR ‘Crohn’s’ AND (‘stricture’ OR ‘fibrosis’), (‘kidney’ OR ‘liver’ OR ‘skin’ OR ‘lung’ OR ‘systemic nephrogenic’ AND ‘fibrosis’ OR ‘anti-fibrotic therapy’). Additionally, references of cited original articles and reviews were further assessed for relevant work. The search included studies between 1960 and 2013. These data together with the authors’ personal experience in the field represent the basis of this review.

Introduction

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic remitting and relapsing disease[1]. During acute flares, CD patients may present with mainly inflammation driven symptoms such as diarrhea, abdominal pain and weight loss[2]. However, over the long-term, the naturally progressive disease course often culminates in stricture formation. For example, around 40% of CD patients with ileal disease develop clinically apparent strictures[3]. Strictures may be subdivided into fibrotic and inflammatory as well as mixed forms[4]. Accordingly, strictures including inflammatory alterations might benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy through a reduction of the inflammation-mediated edema[5]. During the last two decades, the therapeutic armamentarium for CD has expanded significantly, especially with the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)-based strategies that can lead to sustained clinical response rates in a substantial proportion of CD patients[68]. The success of anti-TNF antibodies fueled the hope for altering the natural course of CD. Most recent epidemiological data, however, revealed that despite the establishment of early immunosuppressive therapy in CD patients with an increased risk of disabling disease, the frequency of fibrostenosing complications did not significantly change[9]. Thus, a specific anti-fibrotic therapy for stricturing complications in CD patients is needed. Despite recent advances in the pathophysiological understanding of intestinal fibrosis in CD[10, 11] and in contrast to fibrotic complications in other organs, no specific anti-fibrotic drugs for intestinal strictures are currently available, and all existing therapies used in clinically apparent CD-associated stenosis are the same that are prescribed for active luminal disease. The same holds true for the treatment of penetrating CD, another inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated complication that is linked to impaired intestinal remodeling and healing. Available drugs for the treatment of fibrostenosing or penetrating IBD are depicted in Figure 1. Consequently, the therapy of choice for fibrostenosing CD, in conjunction with purely anti-inflammatory therapy, comprises endoscopic dilation (ED) procedures as well as surgical approaches, with all their associated limitations and morbidity[1214]. A significant number of patients have to undergo multiple surgeries, with the subsequent risk of developing intestinal failure. In general, isolated strictures with a length of 4 cm or less[12] which are devoid of ulcers[15] and are accessible by colonoscopy[16] or double-balloon enteroscopy[17] qualify for ED. Although ED procedures for stricturing CD are usually technically successful, more than one third of patients will still undergo surgery within the next years due to insufficient response to ED[1214]. In addition, major complications such as bowel perforation, bleeding or infection are reported in a range of 2 to 5%[12, 18]. In those CD patients where endoscopic stricture therapy is technically not feasible or not indicated, surgical approaches including resection and strictureplasty are recommended. While repeated surgical bowel resections bear the risk for induction of deficiencies in gastrointestinal functions and ultimately may manifest short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure, strictureplasty can treat intestinal obstruction without reducing intestinal length[10]. Here, the incidence of major complications including anastomotic leakage, abscess, fistula or sepsis is present in about 6%[19]. The recurrence rates differ between various forms of strictureplasty from 23 to 41%[2022]. To date, no head to head comparison between ED and strictureplasty has been performed yet. Taken together, the insufficient therapeutic impact of currently available anti-inflammatory drugs on stricture prevention and treatment, the complications associated with ED or surgical treatment approaches associated with high socioeconomic burden[23] as well as the high recurrence rates of stricturing CD after procedures demand the development and evaluation of specific anti-fibrotic agents for stricturing CD.
Figure 1

Therapeutic strategies to modify wound healing in Crohn’s disease. Currently available therapies for stricturing or fistulizing CD are depicted. Data derived from Embase, Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov. 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine; AZA, azathioprine; CD, Crohn’s disease; ECM, extracellular matrix; IL, interleukin; mAb, monoclonal antibody; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Review

A basic overview of mechanisms of intestinal fibrosis

Fibrosis is defined as the accumulation of collagen-rich extracellular matrix (ECM) in response to tissue damage and is a common complication of multiple chronic diseases[24]. Repetitive or persistent injury of the intestinal epithelium and subsequently deeper layers of the intestinal wall may initiate, perpetuate or maintain progressive fibrosis[24]. With regard to the gastrointestinal tract, acute, short-lived epithelial damage may occur as a consequence of peptic ulcers, infectious enteritis or mild diverticulitis, leading to a full restitution of tissue structure. In contrast, in CD, the gastrointestinal mucosa is exposed to chronic remitting or continuous pro-inflammatory and environmental stimuli. Pleiotropic mechanisms are activated like cellular stress, increased production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as IL-13 or IL-17[25, 26] and growth factors, such as transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1)[27], insulin-like growth factor (IGF)[28], platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)[29] and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)[30]. These mediators crucially contribute to morphological and functional alterations within the bowel wall that may finally culminate in stricture formation and loss of physiological gut functions[31, 32]. In the murine model of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis, inhibition of IL-13 signaling by administration of small interfering RNA targeting the IL-13-α2 receptor attenuated inflammation-associated intestinal fibrosis[25]. This observation was corroborated by work from the same group, indicating that TGF-β1 secretion by macrophages was increased upon IL-13 stimulation in vitro and in vivo[33]. Contractility of isolated intestinal smooth muscle from CD patients was enhanced after pre-stimulation with IL-13[34]. Additionally, increased IL-13 transcripts were detected in muscle extracts from intestinal samples of fibrotic CD patients compared to samples from non-inflamed areas, which results in inhibition of fibroblast matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) synthesis[35]. In contrary to these findings, there was no difference in IL-13 production in mucosal explants and lamina propria mononuclear cells between patients with stricturing CD and control subjects in a different study[36].

IL-17A was found to possess pro-fibrotic activity in various cell types including cardiac fibroblasts[37], hepatic stellate cells[38], skin fibroblasts[39] and lung epithelial cells[40]. In addition, IL-17E was shown to increase collagen production in lung fibroblasts[41]. Consistent with a role of IL-17 in fibrosis IL-17 tissue levels were increased in a murine model of intestinal fibrosis[26]. In human fibrotic CD, IL-17A, but not IL-17E, was overexpressed within tissue samples from CD strictures as compared to non-strictured CD areas and healthy gut. IL-17 secretion from cultured intestinal explants from strictured CD patients was significantly increased as compared to non-strictured CD samples. Moreover, myofibroblasts from CD strictures, expressing the IL-17A receptor, generated more collagen and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) and revealed inhibitory effects on myofibroblast migration[42]. In a clinical trial of patients with inflammatory CD, however, blockade of anti-IL-17A by administration of the anti-IL-17A antibody secukinumab failed to improve disease activity, was associated with a high rate of serious adverse events and had to be stopped prematurely since predefined criteria for futility were met[43], indicating that further studies are necessary before using anti-IL-17-based strategies in the therapy of intestinal fibrosis.

The core mediator in various organs for both, the initiation as well as the maintenance of fibrosis is TGF-β[44]. This growth factor is produced by a vast majority of cells and organs in mammals and is stored in large amounts extracellularly through chemical cross-links to the ECM[45]. The TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway appears pivotal for the development of fibrosis[44]. Canonical intracellular signal transduction is mediated by Smad2/3 phosphorylation by TGF-β receptor I kinase leading to binding of Smad4. This complex translocates into the nucleus and induces TGF-β-specific pro-fibrotic gene expression[46]. Inhibitory members of the Smad family such as Smad6/7 block the phosphorylation of Smad2/3 via competition with the TGF-β receptor I kinase[47, 48].

In addition to the above mentioned mediators, the imbalance of MMPs and TIMPs, which are physiologically involved in maintaining a state of ‘healthy’ remodeling and restitution, can aggravate structural changes of the bowel wall[48, 49].

Restoring the integrity of the intestinal barrier, culminating in epithelial wound closure may help to resolute and regress fibrosis, since continuous barrier defects appear to be one potential trigger for chronic inflammation promoting pro-fibrotic alterations. To this aim ECM-producing mesenchymal cells are recruited. These cells may migrate from neighboring tissue[50], originate from circulating mesenchymal cell precursors or bone marrow stem cell-derived mesenchymal cells[51], arise by proliferation from existing mesenchymal cells[30] or result from epithelial- or endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT and EndoMT, respectively)[52]. Recently, the intestinal microbiota has been identified as a key pro-fibrotic factor, as suggested by several lines of evidence: 1) Ligands to Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) (predominantly from gram-negative bacteria) or TLR2 (predominantly from gram-positive bacteria) activate NF-κB, resulting in cytokine and chemokine secretion by intestinal mesenchymal cells[53]. 2) In several experimental colitis models, microbes initiate or perpetuate gut inflammation and fibrosis, such as in SAMP1/YitFc mice, the IL-10 knock out mice, TNBS and peptidoglycan-polysaccharide (PG-PS)-induced colitis[54]. 3) In humans, gene variants that affect innate immunity, located in or near genes involved in bacterial recognition and processing, are genetically associated to IBD or CD as well as complicated CD courses[55]. 4) Finally, circulating antibodies against microbial components are commonly found in IBD patients and are believed to arise from an immune response towards the luminal microbiota. These antibodies are qualitatively and quantitatively associated with and predictive of a more complicated disease phenotype including fibrostenosis[50, 5658].

Beside chronic inflammation as a major driver of intestinal fibrosis, inflammation-independent mechanisms deserve closer attention. In particular, activated mesenchymal cells, also referred to as disease-activated myofibroblasts, produce and secrete high levels of several collagen types, such as type I, III and V[5961] and ECM compounds, such as fibronectin or tenascin C[62, 63] which get deposited, linked and subsequently form matrix networks that can lead to increased tissue stiffness[64]. Stiffness in itself in the absence of inflammation activates further mesenchymal cells in the form of a positive feedback loop[64]. The ability of myofibroblasts to contract might further increase the luminal narrowing of the intestine and contraction can be induced by factors other than inflammatory mediators[65]. Interestingly, latent matrix-bound TGF-β1 can be activated by mesenchymal cells’ traction forces, pulling against a mechanically resistant ECM. This leads to a conformation change of the latency-associated peptide liberating the active TGF-β1[66].

In summary, despite different physiological functions and unique features of the human gut, such as the high load of microbial components, intestinal fibrosis shares pathological core features with fibrosis of other organs, such as the lung, kidney, skin or liver[24]. Consequently, anti-fibrotic agents with proven efficacy in fibrotic disease of these organs may represent promising candidates for stricturing CD and will be discussed in the following section.

Anti-fibrotic therapeutic approaches in other organs

Commonly used drugs for the anti-inflammatory therapy of CD have been observed to possess at least minor anti-fibrotic properties in other organs. For example, corticosteroids were found to decrease pro-collagen expression in vivo and in vitro[67] as well as to inhibit collagenase activity[68]. Corticosteroids show some effect in retroperitoneal fibrosis[69], systemic sclerosis[70] and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)[71]. In contrast, human intestinal myofibroblasts respond to corticosteroids with enhanced pro-collagen expression upon dexamethasone stimulation[72]. In stricturing CD, small case series report variable therapeutic success rates of intralesional steroid injection[73]. The long-term systemic administration of corticosteroids in CD, however, is obsolete due to severe and pleiotropic side effects. Azathioprine, one of most commonly prescribed immunosuppressive drugs for maintenance of remission in CD patients, is beneficial in the treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis[74] and fibrotic pulmonary disease[75, 76]. In CD patients, azathioprine may delay postoperative, fibrotic complications[77], however, the early use of immunosuppressive treatment regimens does not reduce the occurrence of intestinal strictures and frequency of surgical interventions in the long-term[9, 78]. TNF-α is a critical cytokine in the pathogenesis of IBD and to date four anti-TNF antibodies have shown clinical efficacy as anti-inflammatory agents[7982] and are available for clinical use. Several reports from liver fibrosis[83], pulmonary fibrosis[84] and systemic sclerosis[85] suggest an anti-fibrotic effect of anti-TNF treatment. This could be explained by TNF-α-mediated myofibroblast activation, increased collagen production and TIMP-1 expression as well as inhibition of MMP-2 activity and collagen degradation[86]. In contrast, human intestinal myofibroblasts from CD patients show increased expression of TIMP-1 and decreased collagen production upon exposure to infliximab[87]. After initially conflicting data in patients with CD with a possible pro-fibrotic effect of anti-TNF therapy in vivo, recent data revealed no link between anti-TNF administration with intestinal stricture formation[88]. Information derived from a small retrospective study points towards at least a partial amelioration of stricture formation with anti-TNF therapy[89] and anti-TNF treatment may delay the time to surgery in CD[90].

In daily clinical practice, most CD patients present with established strictures, representing the end-stage of the fibrotic process, and most clinicians see this scenario as an inevitable progression to a likely surgical intervention. This does not have to be so, as the theoretical and practical feasibility to stop or even reverse intestinal fibrosis is supported by the observation that tissue alterations in experimental models of intestinal fibrosis disappear after elimination of the pro-fibrotic stimulus[54]. No therapeutic medical strategy for pre-existing intestinal strictures exists at the moment, but this clinical scenario could greatly improve by looking at existing knowledge derived from other organ systems.

Anti-fibrotic strategies used in the kidney, lung, liver, heart or skin can be grouped into strategies modulating growth factors, inflammation or oxidative stress, intracellular enzymes, and ECM production or assembly (Figure 2). We herein provide a summary of currently available experimental anti-fibrotics that have been tested for indications outside of the intestine. We selected promising mechanisms and agents that could be applicable to stricture therapy of CD in the near future and describe them in greater detail.
Figure 2

Pipeline for therapeutic strategies to alter and improve fibrosis in organs other than the intestine. Each color represents a particular organ. Agents are classified based on their mode of action. Data derived from Embase, Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov. CCL2, chemokine ligand 2; CTGF, connective tissue growth factor; ECM, extracellular matrix; HIF, hypoxia inducible factor; IL, interleukin; JAK, janus kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; mAb, monoclonal antibody; SAP, serum amyloid P component; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide.

Growth factors

Feasibility of TGF-β1 blockade to treat fibrotic diseases has been shown in IPF. In this condition, TGF-β is driving fibrotic alterations and epithelium-dependent fibroblast activation[44]. In murine models of IPF, antagonizing TGF-β action via Tβ-RII (as a ligand decoy), P144, an inhibitor of TGF-β activity, or P17, an anti-TGF-β peptide, resulted in potent anti-fibrotic effects[9193]. In human IPF patients, two phase III trials have shown that treatment with pirfenidone, an agent inhibiting TGF-β activity and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, improved pulmonary function[94, 95]. Pirfenidone is expected to be approved for IPF in Europe soon[96]. Another example for the potential of anti-TGF-β-based strategies is scleroderma, a disease characterized by enhanced expression of TβRI and TβRII in fibroblasts leading to increased collagen I production and ECM deposition in the skin and internal organs[97]. Topical treatment with P144 has shown efficacy in patients with systemic sclerosis, and multiple trials with this agent are currently ongoing. Fresolimumab (GC1008) is a humanized antibody targeting anti-TGF-β1,2 and 3 and was recently evaluated in a phase I trial in patients with treatment-resistant primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis[98]. The humanized αVβ6 integrin-blocking antibody STX-100, which inhibits the activation of latent TGF-β on epithelial cells, is currently being examined in a phase II trial in IPF patients[24, 99]. Comparable results have been reported from kidney fibrosis: preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies indicate an anti-fibrotic activity using anti-TGF-β antibodies, soluble TGF-β receptor, blockade of TGF-β activation by decorin, a small-molecule inhibitor of TGF-β receptors[100], administration of inhibitory protein Smad7[101] and thrombospondin-1 (THBS-1) blocking agent inhibiting TGF-β activation[102]. In human patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, a phase I trial with fresolimumab revealed promising results[98]. Moreover, hepatic growth factor, acting as an inhibitor of Smad2/3 translocation in fibroblasts[103] was observed to mediate anti-fibrotic effects in experimental models of renal and liver fibrosis but was also associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma[104]. Substrate specificity of therapeutics needs to be taken into consideration as well. In an experimental model of scleroderma, blocking activin receptor-like kinase 5 (ALK5), which is involved in phosphorylation of Smad2/3, leads to decreased fibroblast activation. However, ALK5 blockade in clinical trials was associated with adverse events due to cross-reactivity with other kinase inhibitors[105].

In addition to the Smad-signaling cascade, non-Smad pathways comprising TGF-β1 activated MAPKs and several tyrosine kinases have been targeted for anti-fibrotic actions. For example, c-Abelson (c-Abl), a component of the Bcr-Abl oncogene, can be effectively blocked by selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib. This agent inhibits PDGF as well and thus potentially regulates fibroblast proliferation and transformation[106]. Despite promising results from in vitro and in vivo studies, to date limited experience with tyrosine kinases in human fibrotic diseases is available[107, 108]. Of note, novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as nilotinib and dasatinib mediate dose-dependent decreases in ECM production and reveal even greater efficacy as compared to that of imatinib[109], while being well tolerated by the patients[110]. In contrast to TGF-β1, other members of the TGF family such as TGF-β3 possess anti-fibrotic properties. Avotermin is a recombinant bioactive human TGF-β3 that has been tested for treatment of dermal scars and significantly reduces the scar size by intradermal injection therapy[111]. In addition, further growth factors such as serum amyloid P (SAP) have been proven effective in experimental models[112, 113] of fibrosis and have already entered phase I clinical trials in human patients[114].

The scientific rationale to target TGF-β signaling in stricturing CD comes from in vitro as well as in vivo observations. For example, intestinal TGF-β overexpression in mice leads to colonic fibrosis and obstruction[27], while disruption of the TGF-β/Smad signaling cascade protects animals from intestinal fibrosis[115]. In human tissue samples from colonic CD strictures, TGF-β and its receptors as well as pSmad2/3 expression are increased, while Smad7 expression was significantly reduced[116]. Although targeting TGF-β signaling for fibrotic diseases has a strong scientific rationale, it has to be taken into account that this growth factor is not only crucially involved in fibrogenesis but additionally functions as a key regulator of cellular processes including differentiation, proliferation, transformation, tumor suppression as well as immunoregulation and its actions may be context-dependent[96, 117]. For example, TGF-β1-deficient mice develop severe multiorgan inflammation and expire by 5 weeks of age[118, 119]. This outcome occurs even under germ-free conditions[120] and is mediated by CD4+ T cells[121]. Similarly, targeted deletion of Smad2 and Smad4 is associated with early death in mice[122, 123]. Furthermore, administration of metelimumab, a monoclonal antibody against TFG-β1, in human systemic sclerosis patients was associated with significantly more serious adverse events than placebo treatment including musculoskeletal pain, progression of skin involvement and death[124]. Possible side effects during anti-TGF-β therapy would have to be carefully monitored, in particular in case of pre-existing inflammation. Therefore, neutralizing TGF-β 1 in vivo, as an anti-fibrotic approach in CD may be highly problematic, as this may actually lead to disease exacerbation given the potent anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory properties of this cytokine.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were developed with the intention to decrease cholesterol levels. More recently, they were found to mediate anti-inflammatory as well as anti-fibrotic effects in vitro[125], including decreased proliferation of mesangial cells, lower fibronectin as well as type IV collagen expression and decreased secretion of TGF-β1 and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF)[126128]. Corroborating these in vitro findings, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors revealed various anti-fibrotic effects in murine models of nephropathy and fibrosis[126, 127]. In CD patients, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin was shown to mediate anti-inflammatory effects such as inhibition of T cell recruitment via reduced CXCL10 levels[129] and reduce surrogate inflammatory markers such as calprotectin, C-reactive protein and TNF-α expression[130]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that simvastatin reduced TGF-β1 expression in human fibroblasts by inhibition of Smad3 phosphorylation[131] leading, together with induced apoptosis in fibroblast and myofibroblasts, to a significant amelioration of experimental fibrosis[132]. In addition, mesenchymal cells isolated from patients with radiation-induced intestinal fibrosis respond to pravastatin treatment with significantly decreased production of fibronectin and type-1 collagen through Rho-/ROCK-dependent reduction of CTGF expression[133]. Nevertheless, the exact anti-fibrotic potential of statin treatment in stricturing CD still needs to be defined by the use of hard clinical endpoints, but this drug class has an already established safety profile for routine clinical use and could serve as a potential anti-fibrotic treatment approach.

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) modulators

Angiotensin II (AT II) is the major mediator of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). AT II may increase ECM accumulation through plasminogen activator inhibitor-1-mediated decrease of MMPs and enhance TGF-β1 production in cardiac and renal fibrosis[134, 135]. The impact of AT II can also be observed in liver fibrosis. In hepatic stellate cells, AT II induces contraction and proliferation accompanied by increased collagen and TGF-β expression[136]. Accordingly, progression of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus positive patients is significantly decreased after treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors[137]. AT II is crucially involved in the manifestations of renal fibrosis by induction of pro-fibrotic effector molecules and EMT resulting in enhanced ECM production[138], and inhibition of AT II using angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or blocking agents towards the AT I receptor has emerged as a therapeutic approach to slow down renal disease progression[139] and revealed anti-fibrotic actions in the lung, heart and liver[140143]. Interestingly, all components of the RAS have been detected in the human colonic mucosa[144] and AT II is increased in the mucosa of CD patients[145]. In vivo administration of the ACE inhibitor enalaprilate has been proven to reduce weight loss and histological damage in murine dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis[146]. ACE inhibitor treatment was also effective in spontaneous colitis of IL-10-deficient mice[147] and this finding has been confirmed by other studies[148, 149].

Of note, through its AT1 receptor, AT II enhances the expression of CTGF, and administration of AT II inhibitors and AT1 receptor antagonists significantly ameliorates or reverses fibrotic alterations in experimental colitis reflected by reduced collagen amounts and TGF-β1 mRNA levels[150, 151]. Existing preclinical data in IBD combined with clinical trials from the liver and kidney make RAS modulation a promising future approach for CD-associated fibrosis.

Inflammation modulators

Pro-inflammatory cytokines contributing to the pathogenesis of IBD could also be involved in the development of intestinal fibrosis in CD. For example, IL-1 modulates myofibroblast activation, chemokine production, MMP secretion[152] and is involved in EMT induction[153]. IL-6 is known to regulate TGF-β and TGF-βR2 expression as well as fibroblast proliferation[154, 155] and is strongly upregulated in serum and tissue samples from CD patients[156]. IL-4 and IL-13 represent pivotal mediators of immune activation and T helper cell 2 responses are crucially involved in the development of intestinal fibrosis in vivo. IL-13 mediates, through binding to its IL-13Rα, an increased production of TGF-β and is a key player in the initiation of fibrotic alterations in the intestine[25]. Confirmatively, antagonism of IL-13 is effective to prevent fibrosis development in experimental colitis[33, 157]. In addition, several IL-13 antibodies such as lebrikizumab, tralokinumab and QAX576 as well as the anti-TNF antibody etanercept and the immunomodulatory drug thalidomide are currently being evaluated for their anti-fibrotic potency in liver fibrosis and pulmonary fibrosis[24, 158160].

The process of inflammation and fibrosis are likely to be intertwined through angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Increased levels of factors implicated in angiogenesis have been documented in IBD patients, such as vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A)[161]. At a cellular level, PDGF increases proliferation and migration of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts[46]. In the human intestine, PDGF facilitates ECM deposition and is upregulated in inflamed colonic tissue specimen of CD patients[29]. Experience with blocking these agents in other fibrotic diseases exist. In a phase II trial, combined blockade of VEGF, PDGF and bFGF by the indolinone derivative BIBF 1120 tends to decrease the development of human IPF[162]. Critical for the future use of inflammation modulators in the therapy of CD-associated fibrosis will be the quality, quantity and the timing of the approach because all of the above mediators act at different times throughout the disease course, in differing combinations and quantities[163]. Additionally, all of the above molecules interact with each other and blocking a single cytokine at a specific time might not be sufficient for effective anti-fibrotic therapy.

Extracellular matrix modulators

The imbalance between deposition and degradation of ECM in fibrotic disease is a logical target for anti-fibrotic treatment approaches. Stimulation of MMPs as central regulators of ECM disassembly were expected to reverse fibrotic alterations, however, clinical studies in patients with nephrosclerosis failed to show efficacy[164]. Likewise, depletion of TIMP should decrease fibrotic changes, but no amelioration of renal fibrosis was observed following TIMP inhibition in mice[165]. With regard to the intestine, there is growing evidence for MMPs as a regulator of intestinal barrier function and mucosal defense[166], indicating pleiotropic functions of this molecular group in addition to purely matrix regulation. For example, serum MMP-9 levels correlate with disease activity in pediatric CD patients[167] and may be used as a biomarker to follow the course of disease in adult CD patients as well[168, 169]. Colonic tissue expression of MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3 and MMP-9 was significantly increased in samples from inflamed mucosa as compared to non-inflamed mucosal samples[170]. Increased MMP-9 expression in inflamed tissue colonic specimen from CD patients seems to be associated with decreased likelihood of disease recurrence[171]. Finally, in mucosa specimen overlaying colonic strictures in CD patients, MMP-3 and MMP-12 expression was significantly reduced[116]. Thus, MMPs need to be further and carefully investigated as possible targets for anti-fibrotic treatment in as well as outside of the intestine and are not yet ready for prime time.

Intracellular enzymes and receptors

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) protein is a serine/threonine protein kinase that consists of several complexes among which mTOR complex 1 regulates protein synthesis, proliferation as well as fibrotic actions[46]. mTOR inhibitors possess direct anti-fibrotic properties by decreasing fibroblast and myofibroblast numbers and by reducing pro-fibrotic cytokine expression, including IL-4, IL-6, IL-13, IL-17, TGF-β1 as well as type I and III collagen[172, 173]. Efficacy of mTOR inhibitors have been demonstrated in numerous fibrotic disorders of the skin, lung, kidney and liver[46]. With regard to CD, a randomized, double-blind clinical trial found that everolimus was as effective as azathioprine to achieve steroid-free remission in 138 patients with active CD[174]. Additionally, there are two case reports indicating that mTOR inhibitors sirolimus and everolimus are able to induce remission in refractory CD[175, 176]. Given the fact that mTOR inhibitors possess anti-fibrotic as well as immunosuppressive effects, this class of drug appears to be promising for intestinal fibrosis therapy, however, the definitive therapeutic potential for intestinal fibrosis remains to be defined yet.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) is a nuclear receptor that modulates gene expression and is involved in various physiological and pathological processes including inflammation and fibrosis[177]. After stimulation with specific ligands, PPAR-γ directly antagonizes Smad3 or reduces CTGF expression[178]. PPAR-γ agonists are able to improve experimental fibrosis, while PPAR-γ selective antagonists abolish anti-fibrotic actions[179, 180]. Given the fact that CTGF is a key downstream effector of TGF-β on connective tissue cells, FG-3019, a humanized antibody targeting CTGF, has been developed and successfully passed phase I trials in several fibrotic disorders and recently entered phase II studies[24]. In the human intestine, PPAR-γ has been detected in the colonic mucosa and has been identified as a mediator of established anti-inflammatory drugs such as 5-ASA[177, 181]. The future role of PPAR-γ agonists as a possible target for anti-fibrotic treatment in stricturing CD is promising, given the combined action against inflammation and fibrosis and its well-defined mechanism of action. Furthermore, other drug candidates such as endothelin A receptor antagonist bosentan have shown promising results in patients with IPF and renal interstitial fibrosis and deserves further investigation[182, 183].

A summary of compounds used as anti-fibrotic therapies in other organs and their mode of action is depicted in Figure 3. Anti-fibrotic clinical trials of major interest are shown in Table 1.
Figure 3

Compounds used as anti-fibrotic therapies in other organs and their mode of action. The blue boxes represent a major profibrotic pathway. Compounds are depicted in red, indicating their mechanism of action. Abs, antibodies; ALK, activin receptor-like kinase; AT, angiotensin; CTGF, connective tissue growth factor; ECM, extracellular matrix; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A; Inh, Inhibitor; IL, interleukin; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; SMAD, small mothers against decapentaplegic; TGF, transforming growth factor.

Table 1

Completed clinical trials evaluating anti-fibrotic drugs in organs other than the gut

Parameter

Author

Study organ

Number of patents

Type of trial

Study drug

Mode of action

Outcome measures

Growth factors

Noble[95]

Lung

779

RCT, phase III

Pirfenidone

Inhibition of TGF-β

Increased FVC in IPF

Trachtman[98]

Kidney

16

Open-label, phase I

Fresolimumab

Antibody targeting all isoforms of TGF-β

Safety, pharmacokinetics

Ferguson[111]

Skin

223

RCT, phase I/II

Avotermin

Antibody targeting TGF-β3

Acceleration and permanent improvement in dermal scaring

Dillingh[114]

Lung

29

RCT, phase I

rhSAP

Substitution of SAP

Reduction in SAP levels and circulating fibrocytes in healthy control and IPF patients

Oxidative stress

Raghu[158]

Lung

88

RCT, phase II

Etanercept

Blockade of TNF

Physiological and functional decrease in disease progression in IPF

Corren[159]

Lung

219

RCT, phase II

Lebrikizumab

Antibody targeting IL-13

Improved lung function in asthmatic patients

Horton[160]

Lung

23

RCT, phase III

Thalidomide

Anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory

Improvement of cough and respiratory quality of life in IPF

Intracellular enzymes and receptors

Richeldi[162]

Lung

432

RCT, phase II

BIBF 1120

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Tendency towards reduced decline of lung function in IPF

Daniels[108]

Lung

119

RCT, phase II/III

Imatinib

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

No effect on survival and lung function

ECM and other

Couluris[140]

Lung

20

Uncontrolled, interventional study, phase II

Losartan

AT1 antagonist

Stabilization of lung function in IPF

el-Agroudy[142]

Kidney

162

RCT, phase II

Losartan

AT1 antagonist

Decreased TGF-β1 plasma levels and proteinuria in renal interstitial fibrosis

Kuhn[182]

Skin

10

Prospective, open-label, phase II

Bosentan

Endothelin receptor antagonist

Reduced skin thickening in systemic sclerosis

Diez[141]

Heart

34

Uncontrolled, phase II

Losartan

AT1 antagonist

Decreased myocardial collagen content and left ventricular chamber stiffness in hypertensive patients

De[143]

Liver

39

RCT, phase II

Losartan

AT1 antagonist

Reduction of portal pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis

 

King[183]

Lung

616

RCT

Bosentan

Endothelin receptor antagonist

Improvement of FVC and diffusing capacity in IPF

AT1, angiotensin II receptor antagonist subtype 1; CXCL, CXC ligand; ECM, extracellular matrix; FVC, forced vital capacity; IL, interleukin; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SAP, serum amyloid P component; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Challenges and future outlook

The most efficient anti-fibrotic treatment approach still remains the elimination of the primary cause of intestinal injury, which would mean nothing less than curing CD. However, since a magic bullet for CD is not and will most likely not be available in the near future, clinical evaluation and optimization of anti-fibrotic drug candidates for stricturing CD is a justifiable and promising treatment strategy.

However, the simple transfer of these agents into CD treatment is premature and multiple obstacles have to be overcome to make use of the above described mediators and mechanisms.

First, the ideal anti-fibrotic drug should target something uniquely expressed in a specific fibrotic complication in a particular organ and should not display any systemic side effects. This is particularly true in case of concomitant injury elsewhere in the body. To date, however, no specific target for intestinal fibrosis or other fibrotic disease has been identified, which supports the hypothesis that mechanisms of fibrosis are shared between different organs.

Second, the optimal timing to commence anti-fibrotic treatment is of utmost importance to CD patients, however, is not defined yet. It is obvious that an early use of anti-fibrotics is expected to be associated with a better outcome in patients prone to this complication. Pre-existing fibrosis and concomitantly increased tissue stiffness can perpetuate fibrosis even in the absence of inflammation. Data from experimental fibrosis seems to confirm that there might be a critical point in evolution of fibrosis when the progress becomes irreversible[184]. Therefore, an early treatment with anti-fibrotics at the same time of anti-inflammatory agents might be mandatory in human CD patients[185]. Unique to CD is a fistulizing disease process and this complication needs to be kept in mind when using drugs inhibiting tissue remodeling because this could theoretically promote fistulizing disease. However, timing may not be simply based on the disease duration, since up to 50% of CD patients present with stricturing or penetrating disease at the time of first diagnosis[186].

Third, a patient-tailored anti-fibrotic treatment approach necessitates the identification of biomarkers to enable individual risk stratifications for stricturing disease and to follow the individual evolution of fibrosis. As opposed to other organs, such as liver[187, 188] or lung[159], regrettably, no clinically useful biomarkers for stricturing CD as well as for assessment of therapeutic response are available yet. Promising approaches include serology[189, 190] or imaging techniques[191196], but the currently used tools only detect endpoints based on clinical findings of possible CD fibrosis and hence are not accurate.

Fourth, the best route of application for anti-fibrotic agents in stricturing CD has to be elucidated. In line with the beneficial effects of systemic administration of anti-fibrotics in other organs[24], intravenous or oral application may be appropriate. The CD intestine offers the advantage of potential local therapy as a large proportion of strictures is accessible via endoscopy. Intralesional injection or topical application of anti-fibrotics is a valid and practical therapeutic option, as shown by steroid[197] or infliximab application[198]. This approach may be associated with fewer side effects as compared to systemic administration.

Finally, a general limitation to evaluating potential anti-fibrotic agents is the long-lasting evolution of fibrotic complications in patients with CD requiring clinical trials of long duration and large patient populations, making them very expensive and impractical[24].

It is unclear and in the realm of speculation, which of the reviewed drugs has the highest potential for success as an anti-fibrotic treatment in CD. Combining drugs with a known safety profile and anti-fibrotic efficacy, such as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors or inhibitors of the angiotensin system, could serve as a starting point. Given the effect of most substances on a reduction of TGF-β1 proper precaution needs to be taken for carefully monitoring intestinal inflammation. Novel drug delivery systems, such as the Multi Matrix System (MMX®), allowing oral administration of a compound with the substance being released in a defined area of the gastrointestinal tract (such as the terminal ileum) can circumvent systemic side effects, such as hypotension for angiotensin blockade.

To move forward with specific anti-fibrotic therapies in the future we need to focus on identifying mechanisms of fibrogenesis and to develop new and better animal models for this disease (Figure 4). What, however, is badly missing is the availability of biomarkers for natural history and response to therapy that are readily available and easy to measure. Only through utilization of these markers will the field be able to design clinical studies of reasonable length and sufficient patient number, reflected in affordable budgets that put our ability for testing anti-fibrotic therapies within reach.
Figure 4

A suggested path to more efficient translation of new discoveries to Crohn’s disease-associated fibrosis. Adapted from Friedman et al.[24]. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease.

Conclusions

Stricturing CD is still an unresolved problem with strong implications for the patients and a high socioeconomic burden due to frequent hospitalizations and surgery[23]. Despite recent advances in the pathophysiological understanding of fibrosis and significant expansion of the anti-inflammatory armamentarium over the last few decades, the occurrence of intestinal strictures in CD patients did not significantly change. To date, effective therapeutic approaches for stricturing CD are limited to ED or surgical interventions. The data presented in this review highlight the pleiotropic anti-fibrotic actions that have been observed with the use of numerous agents in fibrotic complications of the skin, the lung and the kidney. Thus, it is justified to propose further evaluation of these drug candidates in clinical trials for the management of intestinal fibrosis. However, previous establishment of non-invasive biomarkers to assess the degree of fibrosis, to monitor fibrotic evolution and to predict therapeutic response, combined with the development of imaging techniques to quantify intestinal fibrosis, appear to be essential pre-requisites for individual risk stratification and proper design of clinical trials.

Notes

Abbreviations

6-MP: 

6-Mercaptopurine

ACE: 

Angiotensin-converting enzyme

ALK: 

Activin receptor-like kinase

AT II: 

Angiotensin II

AZA: 

Azathioprine

bFGF: 

Basic fibroblast growth factor

c-Abl: 

c-Abelson

CD: 

Crohn’s disease

CTGF: 

Connective tissue growth factor

DSS: 

Dextran sulfate sodium

ECM: 

Extracellular matrix

ED: 

Endoscopic dilation

EMT: 

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

EndoMT: 

Endothelial-mesenchymal transition

HMG-CoA: 

3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A

IBD: 

Inflammatory bowel disease

IGF: 

Insulin-like growth factor

IL: 

Interleukin

IPF: 

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

MAPK: 

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MMP: 

Matrix metalloproteinase

mTOR: 

Mammalian target of rapamycin

NF-κB: 

Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

NIH: 

National Institutes of Health

NLM: 

National Library of Medicine

PDGF: 

Platelet-derived growth factor

PG-PS: 

Peptidoglycan-polysaccharide

PPAR: 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

RAS: 

Renin-angiotensin system

ROCK: 

Rho-associated protein kinase

SAP: 

Serum amyloid P component

TGF: 

Transforming growth factor

THBS: 

Thrombospondin

TIMP: 

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase

TLR: 

Toll-like receptor

TNBS: 

2,4,6-Trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

DB was supported by a research fellowship from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. FR is funded by the NIH (grant: 1T32DK083251-01A1). The authors would like to thank Dr Claudio Fiocchi and Dr Bo Shen, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA, for helpful comments.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine B, University Hospital of Münster
(2)
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
(3)
Department of Pathobiology, Lerner Research Institute, NC22, Cleveland Clinic Foundation

References

  1. Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ: Crohn’s disease. Lancet. 2012, 380: 1590-1605. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60026-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheifetz AS: Management of active Crohn disease. JAMA. 2013, 309: 2150-2158. 10.1001/jama.2013.4466.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P, Cortot A: Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011, 140: 1785-1794. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.055.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lenze F, Wessling J, Bremer J, Ullerich H, Spieker T, Weckesser M, Gonschorrek S, Kannengiesser K, Rijcken E, Heidemann J, Luegering A, Schober O, Domschke W, Kucharzik T, Maaser C: Detection and differentiation of inflammatory versus fibromatous Crohn’s disease strictures: prospective comparison of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, MR-enteroclysis, and transabdominal ultrasound versus endoscopic/histologic evaluation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012, 18: 2252-2260. 10.1002/ibd.22930.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Schoepfer AM, Safroneeva E, Vavricka SR, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Mottet C: Treatment of fibrostenotic and fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Digestion. 2012, 86 (Suppl 1): 23-27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, Mayer LF, Schreiber S, Colombel JF, Rachmilewitz D, Wolf DC, Olson A, Bao W, Rutgeerts P, ACCENT I Study Group: Maintenance infliximab for Crohn’s disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet. 2002, 359: 1541-1549. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08512-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sandborn WJ, Hanauer SB, Rutgeerts P, Fedorak RN, Lukas M, MacIntosh DG, Panaccione R, Wolf D, Kent JD, Bittle B, Li J, Pollack PF: Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of Crohn’s disease: results of the CLASSIC II trial. Gut. 2007, 56: 1232-1239. 10.1136/gut.2006.106781.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, Hanauer SB, Panaccione R, Schreiber S, Byczkowski D, Li J, Kent JD, Pollack PF: Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn’s disease: the CHARM trial. Gastroenterology. 2007, 132: 52-65. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.041.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosnes J, Nion-Larmurier I, Beaugerie L, Afchain P, Tiret E, Gendre JP: Impact of the increasing use of immunosuppressants in Crohn’s disease on the need for intestinal surgery. Gut. 2005, 54: 237-241. 10.1136/gut.2004.045294.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rieder F, Zimmermann EM, Remzi FH, Sandborn WJ: Crohn’s disease complicated by strictures: a systematic review. Gut. 2013, 62: 1072-1084. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304353.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Rieder F, Fiocchi C: Intestinal fibrosis in inflammatory bowel disease: progress in basic and clinical science. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008, 24: 462-468. 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282ff8b36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hassan C, Zullo A, De Francesco V, Ierardi E, Giustini M, Pitidis A, Taggi F, Winn S, Morini S: Systematic review: endoscopic dilatation in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007, 26: 1457-1464. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03532.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Thienpont C, D’Hoore A, Vermeire S, Demedts I, Bisschops R, Coremans G, Rutgeerts P, Van Assche G: Long-term outcome of endoscopic dilatation in patients with Crohn’s disease is not affected by disease activity or medical therapy. Gut. 2010, 59: 320-324. 10.1136/gut.2009.180182.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Singh VV, Draganov P, Valentine J: Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation of symptomatic upper and lower gastrointestinal Crohn’s disease strictures. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005, 39: 284-290. 10.1097/01.mcg.0000155128.31208.44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffmann JC, Heller F, Faiss S, von Lampe B, Kroesen AJ, Wahnschaffe U, Schulzke JD, Zeitz M, Bojarski C: Through the endoscope balloon dilation of ileocolonic strictures: prognostic factors, complications, and effectiveness. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008, 23: 689-696. 10.1007/s00384-008-0461-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Froehlich F, Juillerat P, Pittet V, Felley C, Mottet C, Vader JP, Michetti P, Gonvers JJ: Maintenance of surgically induced remission of Crohn’s disease. Digestion. 2007, 76: 130-135. 10.1159/000111027.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Despott EJ, Gupta A, Burling D, Tripoli E, Konieczko K, Hart A, Fraser C: Effective dilation of small-bowel strictures by double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with symptomatic Crohn’s disease (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009, 70: 1030-1036. 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustavsson A, Magnuson A, Blomberg B, Andersson M, Halfvarson J, Tysk C: Endoscopic dilation is an efficacious and safe treatment of intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012, 36: 151-158. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05146.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wibmer AG, Kroesen AJ, Grone J, Buhr HJ, Ritz JP: Comparison of strictureplasty and endoscopic balloon dilatation for stricturing Crohn’s disease–review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010, 25: 1149-1157. 10.1007/s00384-010-1010-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Baba S, Nakai K: Strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 1995, 30 (Suppl 8): 135-138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ambe R, Campbell L, Cagir B: A comprehensive review of strictureplasty techniques in Crohn’s disease: types, indications, comparisons, and safety. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012, 16: 209-217. 10.1007/s11605-011-1651-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Beyls J, Kerremans R, Hiele M: Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1990, 99: 956-963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bodger K, Kikuchi T, Hughes D: Cost-effectiveness of biological therapy for Crohn’s disease: Markov cohort analyses incorporating United Kingdom patient-level cost data. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 30: 265-274. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04033.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman SL, Sheppard D, Duffield JS, Violette S: Therapy for fibrotic diseases: nearing the starting line. Sci Transl Med. 2013, 5: 167sr1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fichtner-Feigl S, Young CA, Kitani A, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, Strober W: IL-13 signaling via IL-13R alpha2 induces major downstream fibrogenic factors mediating fibrosis in chronic TNBS colitis. Gastroenterology. 2008, 135: 2003-2013. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.055.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhu MY, Lu YM, Ou YX, Zhang HZ, Chen WX: Dynamic progress of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid induced chronic colitis and fibrosis in rat model. J Dig Dis. 2012, 13: 421-429. 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2012.00607.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Vallance BA, Gunawan MI, Hewlett B, Bercik P, Van Kampen C, Galeazzi F, Sime PJ, Gauldie J, Collins SM: TGF-beta1 gene transfer to the mouse colon leads to intestinal fibrosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005, 289: G116-G128. 10.1152/ajpgi.00051.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahavadi S, Flynn RS, Grider JR, Qiao LY, Murthy KS, Hazelgrove KB, Kuemmerle JF: Amelioration of excess collagen IalphaI, fibrosis, and smooth muscle growth in TNBS-induced colitis in IGF-I(+/-) mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011, 17: 711-719. 10.1002/ibd.21437.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumagai S, Ohtani H, Nagai T, Funa K, Hiwatashi NO, Shimosegawa , Nagura H: Platelet-derived growth factor and its receptors are expressed in areas of both active inflammation and active fibrosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2001, 195: 21-33. 10.1620/tjem.195.21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawrance IC, Maxwell L, Doe W: Altered response of intestinal mucosal fibroblasts to profibrogenic cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001, 7: 226-236. 10.1097/00054725-200108000-00008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wynn TA, Ramalingam TR: Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat Med. 2012, 18: 1028-1040. 10.1038/nm.2807.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Rieder F, Fiocchi C: Intestinal fibrosis in IBD - a dynamic, multifactorial process. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009, 6: 228-235. 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Fichtner-Feigl S, Strober W, Kawakami K, Puri RK, Kitani A: IL-13 signaling through the IL-13alpha2 receptor is involved in induction of TGF-beta1 production and fibrosis. Nat Med. 2006, 12: 99-106. 10.1038/nm1332.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Akiho H, Lovato P, Deng Y, Ceponis PJ, Blennerhassett P, Collins SM: Interleukin-4- and -13-induced hypercontractility of human intestinal muscle cells-implication for motility changes in Crohn’s disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005, 288: G609-G615. 10.1152/ajpgi.00273.2004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bailey JR, Bland PW, Tarlton JF, Peters I, Moorghen M, Sylvester PA, Probert CS, Whiting CV: IL-13 promotes collagen accumulation in Crohn’s disease fibrosis by down-regulation of fibroblast MMP synthesis: a role for innate lymphoid cells?. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e52332-10.1371/journal.pone.0052332.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Biancheri P, Di Sabatino A, Ammoscato F, Facciotti F, Caprioli F, Curciarello R, Hoque SS, Ghanbari A, Joe-Njoku I, Giuffrida P, Rovedatti L, Geginat J, Corazza GR, Macdonald TT: Absence of a role for interleukin-13 in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Immunol. 2014, 44: 370-385. 10.1002/eji.201343524.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Valente AJ, Yoshida T, Gardner JD, Somanna N, Delafontaine P, Chandrasekar B: Interleukin-17A stimulates cardiac fibroblast proliferation and migration via negative regulation of the dual-specificity phosphatase MKP-1/DUSP-1. Cell Signal. 2012, 24: 560-568. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.10.010.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Meng F, Wang K, Aoyama T, Grivennikov SI, Paik Y, Scholten D, Cong M, Iwaisako K, Liu X, Zhang M, Osterreicher CH, Stickel F, Ley K, Brenner DA, Kisseleva T: Interleukin-17 signaling in inflammatory, Kupffer cells, and hepatic stellate cells exacerbates liver fibrosis in mice. Gastroenterology. 2012, 143: 765-776. 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.049.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Okamoto Y, Hasegawa M, Matsushita T, Hamaguchi Y, Huu DL, Iwakura Y, Fujimoto M, Takehara K: Potential roles of interleukin-17A in the development of skin fibrosis in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64: 3726-3735. 10.1002/art.34643.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Mi S, Li Z, Yang HZ, Liu H, Wang JP, Ma YG, Wang XX, Liu HZ, Sun W, Hu ZW: Blocking IL-17A promotes the resolution of pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis via TGF-beta1-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J Immunol. 2011, 187: 3003-3014. 10.4049/jimmunol.1004081.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Gregory LG, Jones CP, Walker SA, Sawant D, Gowers KH, Campbell GA, McKenzie AN, Lloyd CM: IL-25 drives remodelling in allergic airways disease induced by house dust mite. Thorax. 2013, 68: 82-90. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202003.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Biancheri P, Pender SL, Ammoscato F, Giuffrida P, Sampietro G, Ardizzone S, Ghanbari A, Curciarello R, Pasini A, Monteleone G, Corazza GR, Macdonald TT, Di Sabatino A: The role of interleukin 17 in Crohn’s disease-associated intestinal fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2013, 6: 13-10.1186/1755-1536-6-13.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Hueber W, Sands BE, Lewitzky S, Vandemeulebroecke M, Reinisch W, Higgins PD, Wehkamp J, Feagan BG, Yao MD, Karczewski M, Karczewski J, Pezous N, Bek S, Bruin G, Mellgard B, Berger C, Londei M, Bertolino AP, Tougas G, Travis SP, Secukinumab in Crohn’s Disease Study Group: Secukinumab, a human anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease: unexpected results of a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gut. 2012, 61: 1693-1700. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301668.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hawinkels LJ, Ten Dijke P: Exploring anti-TGF-beta therapies in cancer and fibrosis. Growth Factors. 2011, 29: 140-152. 10.3109/08977194.2011.595411.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Munger JS, Harpel JG, Gleizes PE, Mazzieri R, Nunes I, Rifkin DB: Latent transforming growth factor-beta: structural features and mechanisms of activation. Kidney Int. 1997, 51: 1376-1382. 10.1038/ki.1997.188.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Latella G, Sferra R, Speca S, Vetuschi A, Gaudio E: Can we prevent, reduce or reverse intestinal fibrosis in IBD?. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013, 17: 1283-1304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Monteleone G, Pallone F, MacDonald TT: Smad7 in TGF-beta-mediated negative regulation of gut inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25: 513-517. 10.1016/j.it.2004.07.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. McKaig BC, McWilliams D, Watson SA, Mahida YR: Expression and regulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinases by intestinal myofibroblasts in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Pathol. 2003, 162: 1355-1360. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63931-4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Medina C, Santos-Martinez MJ, Santana A, Paz-Cabrera MC, Johnston MJ, Mourelle M, Salas A, Guarner F: Transforming growth factor-beta type 1 receptor (ALK5) and Smad proteins mediate TIMP-1 and collagen synthesis in experimental intestinal fibrosis. J Pathol. 2011, 224: 461-472. 10.1002/path.2870.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Rieder F, Georgieva M, Schirbel A, Artinger M, Zugner A, Blank M, Brenmoehl J, Scholmerich J, Rogler G: Prostaglandin E2 inhibits migration of colonic lamina propria fibroblasts. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010, 16: 1505-1513. 10.1002/ibd.21255.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Brittan M, Chance V, Elia G, Poulsom R, Alison MR, MacDonald TT, Wright NA: A regenerative role for bone marrow following experimental colitis: contribution to neovasculogenesis and myofibroblasts. Gastroenterology. 1984–1995, 2005: 128.Google Scholar
  52. Kalluri R: EMT: when epithelial cells decide to become mesenchymal-like cells. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 1417-1419. 10.1172/JCI39675.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Otte JM, Rosenberg IM, Podolsky DK: Intestinal myofibroblasts in innate immune responses of the intestine. Gastroenterology. 1866–1878, 2003: 124.Google Scholar
  54. Rieder F, Kessler S, Sans M, Fiocchi C: Animal models of intestinal fibrosis: new tools for the understanding of pathogenesis and therapy of human disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012, 303: G786-G801. 10.1152/ajpgi.00059.2012.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, Duerr RH, McGovern DP, Hui KY, Lee JC, Schumm LP, Sharma Y, Anderson CA, Essers J, Mitrovic M, Ning K, Cleynen I, Theatre E, Spain SL, Raychaudhuri S, Goyette P, Wei Z, Abraham C, Achkar JP, Ahmad T, Amininejad L, Ananthakrishnan AN, Andersen V, Andrews JM, Baidoo L, Balschun T, Bampton PA, Bitton A: Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012, 491: 119-124. 10.1038/nature11582.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Dubinsky MC, Lin YC, Dutridge D, Picornell Y, Landers CJ, Farrior S, Wrobel I, Quiros A, Vasiliauskas EA, Grill B, Israel D, Bahar R, Christie D, Wahbeh G, Silber G, Dallazadeh S, Shah P, Thomas D, Kelts D, Hershberg RM, Elson CO, Targan SR, Taylor KD, Rotter JI, Yang H, Western Regional Pediatric IBD Research Alliance: Serum immune responses predict rapid disease progression among children with Crohn’s disease: immune responses predict disease progression. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006, 101: 360-367. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00456.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Rieder F, Schleder S, Wolf A, Dirmeier A, Strauch U, Obermeier F, Lopez R, Spector L, Fire E, Yarden J, Rogler G, Dotan N, Klebl F: Serum anti-glycan antibodies predict complicated Crohn’s disease behavior: a cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010, 16: 1367-1375. 10.1002/ibd.21179.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Rieder F, Schleder S, Wolf A, Dirmeier A, Strauch U, Obermeier F, Lopez R, Spector L, Fire E, Yarden J, Rogler G, Dotan N, Klebl F: Association of the novel serologic anti-glycan antibodies anti-laminarin and anti-chitin with complicated Crohn’s disease behavior. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010, 16: 263-274. 10.1002/ibd.21046.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Geboes KP, Cabooter L, Geboes K: Contribution of morphology for the comprehension of mechanisms of fibrosis in inflammatory enterocolitis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2000, 63: 371-376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Graham MF, Diegelmann RF, Elson CO, Lindblad WJ, Gotschalk N, Gay S, Gay R: Collagen content and types in the intestinal strictures of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1988, 94: 257-265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Borley NR, Mortensen NJ, Kettlewell MG, George BD, Jewell DP, Warren BF: Connective tissue changes in ileal Crohn’s disease: relationship to disease phenotype and ulcer-associated cell lineage. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001, 44: 388-396. 10.1007/BF02234738.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Geboes K, El-Zine MY, Dalle I, El-Haddad S, Rutgeerts P, Van Eyken P: Tenascin and strictures in inflammatory bowel disease: an immunohistochemical study. Int J Surg Pathol. 2001, 9: 281-286. 10.1177/106689690100900404.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Gelbmann CM, Mestermann S, Gross V, Kollinger M, Scholmerich J, Falk W: Strictures in Crohn’s disease are characterised by an accumulation of mast cells colocalised with laminin but not with fibronectin or vitronectin. Gut. 1999, 45: 210-217. 10.1136/gut.45.2.210.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Wells RG: The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology. 2008, 47: 1394-1400. 10.1002/hep.22193.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Ura H, Obara T, Yokota K, Shibata Y, Okamura K, Namiki M: Effects of transforming growth factor-beta released from gastric carcinoma cells on the contraction of collagen-matrix gels containing fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 1991, 51: 3550-3554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Hinz B: Tissue stiffness, latent TGF-beta1 activation, and mechanical signal transduction: implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of fibrosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2009, 11: 120-126. 10.1007/s11926-009-0017-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Oikarinen AI, Vuorio EI, Zaragoza EJ, Palotie A, Chu ML, Uitto J: Modulation of collagen metabolism by glucocorticoids. Receptor-mediated effects of dexamethasone on collagen biosynthesis in chick embryo fibroblasts and chondrocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 1988, 37: 1451-1462. 10.1016/0006-2952(88)90006-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Ketchum LD, Smith J, Robinson DW, Masters FW: The treatment of hypertrophic scar, keloid and scar contracture by triamcinolone acetonide. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966, 38: 209-218. 10.1097/00006534-196609000-00005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Vaglio A, Palmisano A, Alberici F, Maggiore U, Ferretti S, Cobelli R, Ferrozzi F, Corradi D, Salvarani C, Buzio C: Prednisone versus tamoxifen in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011, 378: 338-346. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60934-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Badea I, Taylor M, Rosenberg A, Foldvari M: Pathogenesis and therapeutic approaches for improved topical treatment in localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009, 48: 213-221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Peikert T, Daniels CE, Beebe TJ, Meyer KC, Ryu JH, Interstitial Lung Diseases Network of the American College of Chest Physicians: Assessment of current practice in the diagnosis and therapy of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. 2008, 102: 1342-1348. 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.03.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Graham MF, Willey A, Adams J, Diegelmann RF: Corticosteroids increase procollagen gene expression, synthesis, and secretion by human intestinal smooth muscle cells. Gastroenterology. 1995, 109: 1454-1461. 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90630-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Kochhar R, Poornachandra KS: Intralesional steroid injection therapy in the management of resistant gastrointestinal strictures. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010, 2: 61-68.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Warnatz K, Keskin AG, Uhl M, Scholz C, Katzenwadel A, Vaith P, Peter HH, Walker UA: Immunosuppressive treatment of chronic periaortitis: a retrospective study of 20 patients with chronic periaortitis and a review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005, 64: 828-833. 10.1136/ard.2004.029793.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Rogliani P, Mura M, Assunta Porretta M, Saltini C: New perspectives in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2008, 2: 75-93. 10.1177/1753465808089363.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Dheda K, Lalloo UG, Cassim B, Mody GM: Experience with azathioprine in systemic sclerosis associated with interstitial lung disease. Clin Rheumatol. 2004, 23: 306-309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Deltenre P, Ardizzone S, D’Haens G, Hanauer SB, Herfarth H, Lemann M, Colombel JF: Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the prevention of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2089–2096, 2009: 104.Google Scholar
  78. Spinelli A, Correale C, Szabo H, Montorsi M: Intestinal fibrosis in Crohn’s disease: medical treatment or surgery?. Curr Drug Targets. 2010, 11: 242-248. 10.2174/138945010790309984.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Fedorak RN, Lukas M, MacIntosh D, Panaccione R, Wolf D, Pollack P: Human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody (adalimumab) in Crohn’s disease: the CLASSIC-I trial. Gastroenterology. 2006, 130: 323-333. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.030. quiz 591PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, Mantzaris GJ, Kornbluth A, Rachmilewitz D, Lichtiger S, D’Haens G, Diamond RH, Broussard DL, Tang KL, van der Woude CJ, Rutgeerts P, SONIC Study Group: Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362: 1383-1395. 10.1056/NEJMoa0904492.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Marano C, Zhang H, Strauss R, Johanns J, Adedokun OJ, Guzzo C, Colombel JF, Reinisch W, Gibson PR, Collins J, Jarnerot G, Hibi T, Rutgeerts P, PURSUIT-SC Study Group: Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2014, 146: 85-95. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.048.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Stoinov S, Honiball PJ, Rutgeerts P, Mason D, Bloomfield R, Schreiber S, PRECISE 1 Study Investigators: Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 228-238. 10.1056/NEJMoa067594.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Bahcecioglu IH, Koca SS, Poyrazoglu OK, Yalniz M, Ozercan IH, Ustundag B, Sahin K, Dagli AF, Isik A: Hepatoprotective effect of infliximab, an anti-TNF-alpha agent, on carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic fibrosis. Inflammation. 2008, 31: 215-221. 10.1007/s10753-008-9067-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Antoniou KM, Mamoulaki M, Malagari K, Kritikos HD, Bouros D, Siafakas NM, Boumpas DT: Infliximab therapy in pulmonary fibrosis associated with collagen vascular disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007, 25: 23-28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Bargagli E, Galeazzi M, Bellisai F, Volterrani L, Rottoli P: Infliximab treatment in a patient with systemic sclerosis associated with lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Respiration. 2008, 75: 346-349. 10.1159/000090248.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Theiss AL, Simmons JG, Jobin C, Lund PK: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha increases collagen accumulation and proliferation in intestinal myofibroblasts via TNF receptor 2. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 36099-36109. 10.1074/jbc.M505291200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Di Sabatino A, Pender SL, Jackson CL, Prothero JD, Gordon JN, Picariello L, Rovedatti L, Docena G, Monteleone G, Rampton DS, Tonelli F, Corazza GR, MacDonald TT: Functional modulation of Crohn’s disease myofibroblasts by anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies. Gastroenterology. 2007, 133: 137-149. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.069.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Lichtenstein GR, Olson A, Travers S, Diamond RH, Chen DM, Pritchard ML, Feagan BG, Cohen RD, Salzberg BA, Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ: Factors associated with the development of intestinal strictures or obstructions in patients with Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006, 101: 1030-1038. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00463.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Pelletier AL, Kalisazan B, Wienckiewicz J, Bouarioua N, Soule JC: Infliximab treatment for symptomatic Crohn’s disease strictures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 29: 279-285. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03887.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Schnitzler F, Fidder H, Ferrante M, Noman M, Arijs I, Van Assche G, Hoffman I, Van Steen K, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P: Long-term outcome of treatment with infliximab in 614 patients with Crohn’s disease: results from a single-centre cohort. Gut. 2009, 58: 492-500. 10.1136/gut.2008.155812.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Yamada M, Kuwano K, Maeyama T, Yoshimi M, Hamada N, Fukumoto J, Egashira K, Hiasa K, Takayama K, Nakanishi Y: Gene transfer of soluble transforming growth factor type II receptor by in vivo electroporation attenuates lung injury and fibrosis. J Clin Pathol. 2007, 60: 916-920.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Arribillaga L, Dotor J, Basagoiti M, Riezu-Boj JI, Borras-Cuesta F, Lasarte JJ, Sarobe P, Cornet ME, Feijoo E: Therapeutic effect of a peptide inhibitor of TGF-beta on pulmonary fibrosis. Cytokine. 2011, 53: 327-333. 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.11.019.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Ezquerro IJ, Lasarte JJ, Dotor J, Castilla-Cortazar I, Bustos M, Penuelas I, Blanco G, Rodriguez C, Lechuga Mdel C, Greenwel P, Rojkind M, Prieto J, Borras-Cuesta F: A synthetic peptide from transforming growth factor beta type III receptor inhibits liver fibrogenesis in rats with carbon tetrachloride liver injury. Cytokine. 2003, 22: 12-20. 10.1016/S1043-4666(03)00101-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Azuma A: Pirfenidone treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2012, 6: 107-114. 10.1177/1753465812436663.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Noble PW, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Glassberg MK, Kardatzke D, King TE, Lancaster L, Sahn SA, Szwarcberg J, Valeyre D, du Bois RM, CAPACITY Study Group: Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CAPACITY): two randomised trials. Lancet. 2011, 377: 1760-1769. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60405-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Akhurst RJ, Hata A: Targeting the TGFbeta signalling pathway in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012, 11: 790-811. 10.1038/nrd3810.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Beyer C, Distler O, Distler JH: Innovative antifibrotic therapies in systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2012, 24: 274-280. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283524b9a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Trachtman H, Fervenza FC, Gipson DS, Heering P, Jayne DR, Peters H, Rota S, Remuzzi G, Rump LC, Sellin LK, Heaton JP, Streisand JB, Hard ML, Ledbetter SR, Vincenti F: A phase 1, single-dose study of fresolimumab, an anti-TGF-beta antibody, in treatment-resistant primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. 2011, 79: 1236-1243. 10.1038/ki.2011.33.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Crunkhorn S: Deal watch: Biogen acquires Stromedix to pursue novel fibrosis therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012, 11: 260.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Alan C, Kocoglu H, Altintas R, Alici B, Resit Ersay A: Protective effect of decorin on acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury in the rat kidney. Arch Med Sci. 2011, 7: 211-216.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Terada Y, Hanada S, Nakao A, Kuwahara M, Sasaki S, Marumo F: Gene transfer of Smad7 using electroporation of adenovirus prevents renal fibrosis in post-obstructed kidney. Kidney Int. 2002, 61: S94-S98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Lu A, Miao M, Schoeb TR, Agarwal A, Murphy-Ullrich JE: Blockade of TSP1-dependent TGF-beta activity reduces renal injury and proteinuria in a murine model of diabetic nephropathy. Am J Pathol. 2011, 178: 2573-2586. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.02.039.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Liu Y: Hepatocyte growth factor in kidney fibrosis: therapeutic potential and mechanisms of action. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004, 287: F7-F16. 10.1152/ajprenal.00451.2003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Liu Y: Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics. Kidney Int. 2006, 69: 213-217. 10.1038/sj.ki.5000054.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Szabo H, Fiorino G, Spinelli A, Rovida S, Repici A, Malesci AC, Danese S: Review article: anti-fibrotic agents for the treatment of Crohn’s disease - lessons learnt from other diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010, 31: 189-201.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Daniels CE, Wilkes MC, Edens M, Kottom TJ, Murphy SJ, Limper AH, Leof EB: Imatinib mesylate inhibits the profibrogenic activity of TGF-beta and prevents bleomycin-mediated lung fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2004, 114: 1308-1316. 10.1172/JCI200419603.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Gordon J, Spiera R: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of systemic sclerosis: the difficulty in interpreting proof-of-concept studies. Int J Rheumatol. 2011, 2011: 842181.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Daniels CE, Lasky JA, Limper AH, Mieras K, Gabor E, Schroeder DR, Imatinib-IPF Study Investigators: Imatinib treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Randomized placebo-controlled trial results. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010, 181: 604-610. 10.1164/rccm.200906-0964OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Kantarjian H, Jabbour E, Grimley J, Kirkpatrick P: Dasatinib. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006, 5: 717-718. 10.1038/nrd2135.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Gordon J, Spiera R: Imatinib and the treatment of fibrosis: recent trials and tribulations. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011, 13: 51-58. 10.1007/s11926-010-0146-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Ferguson MW, Duncan J, Bond J, Bush J, Durani P, So K, Taylor L, Chantrey J, Mason T, James G, Laverty H, Occleston NL, Sattar A, Ludlow A, O’Kane S: Prophylactic administration of avotermin for improvement of skin scarring: three double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I/II studies. Lancet. 2009, 373: 1264-1274. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60322-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Haudek SB, Xia Y, Huebener P, Lee JM, Carlson S, Crawford JR, Pilling D, Gomer RH, Trial J, Frangogiannis NG, Entman ML: Bone marrow-derived fibroblast precursors mediate ischemic cardiomyopathy in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 18284-18289. 10.1073/pnas.0608799103.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Pilling D, Roife D, Wang M, Ronkainen SD, Crawford JR, Travis EL, Gomer RH: Reduction of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by serum amyloid P. J Immunol. 2007, 179: 4035-4044.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Dillingh MR, van den Blink B, Moerland M, van Dongen MG, Levi M, Kleinjan A, Wijsenbeek MS, Lupher ML, Harper DM, Getsy JA, Hoogsteden HC, Burggraaf J: Recombinant human serum amyloid P in healthy volunteers and patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013, 26: 672-676. 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.01.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Latella G, Sferra R, Vetuschi A, Zanninelli G, D’Angelo A, Catitti V, Caprilli R, Gaudio E: Prevention of colonic fibrosis by Boswellia and Scutellaria extracts in rats with colitis induced by 2,4,5-trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008, 38: 410-420. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.01955.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Di Sabatino A, Jackson CL, Pickard KM, Buckley M, Rovedatti L, Leakey NA, Picariello L, Cazzola P, Monteleone G, Tonelli F, Corazza GR, MacDonald TT, Pender SL: Transforming growth factor beta signalling and matrix metalloproteinases in the mucosa overlying Crohn’s disease strictures. Gut. 2009, 58: 777-789. 10.1136/gut.2008.149096.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Bierie B, Moses HL: Tumour microenvironment: TGFbeta: the molecular Jekyll and Hyde of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 506-520. 10.1038/nrc1926.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Diebold RJ, Eis MJ, Yin M, Ormsby I, Boivin GP, Darrow BJ, Saffitz JE, Doetschman T: Early-onset multifocal inflammation in the transforming growth factor beta 1-null mouse is lymphocyte mediated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92: 12215-12219. 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12215.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Kulkarni AB, Ward JM, Yaswen L, Mackall CL, Bauer SR, Huh CG, Gress RE, Karlsson S: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 null mice. An animal model for inflammatory disorders. Am J Pathol. 1995, 146: 264-275.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Boivin GP, Ormsby I, Jones-Carson J, O’Toole BA, Doetschman T: Germ-free and barrier-raised TGF beta 1-deficient mice have similar inflammatory lesions. Transgenic Res. 1997, 6: 197-202. 10.1023/A:1018490007745.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Gorelik L, Flavell RA: Abrogation of TGFbeta signaling in T cells leads to spontaneous T cell differentiation and autoimmune disease. Immunity. 2000, 12: 171-181. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80170-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Nomura M, Li E: Smad2 role in mesoderm formation, left-right patterning and craniofacial development. Nature. 1998, 393: 786-790. 10.1038/31693.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Yang X, Li C, Xu X, Deng C: The tumor suppressor SMAD4/DPC4 is essential for epiblast proliferation and mesoderm induction in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 3667-3672. 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3667.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Denton CP, Merkel PA, Furst DE, Khanna D, Emery P, Hsu VM, Silliman N, Streisand J, Powell J, Akesson A, Coppock J, Hoogen F, Herrick A, Mayes MD, Veale D, Haas J, Ledbetter S, Korn JH, Black CM, Seibold JR, Cat-192 Study Group; Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium: Recombinant human anti-transforming growth factor beta1 antibody therapy in systemic sclerosis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trial of CAT-192. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56: 323-333. 10.1002/art.22289.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Li C, Yang CW, Park JH, Lim SW, Sun BK, Jung JY, Kim SB, Kim YS, Kim J, Bang BK: Pravastatin treatment attenuates interstitial inflammation and fibrosis in a rat model of chronic cyclosporine-induced nephropathy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004, 286: F46-F57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Chen HC, Guh JY, Shin SJ, Lai YH: Pravastatin suppress superoxide and fibronectin production of glomerular mesangial cells induced by oxidized-LDL and high glucose. Atherosclerosis. 2002, 160: 141-146. 10.1016/S0021-9150(01)00545-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Hartner A, Klanke B, Cordasic N, Amann K, Schmieder RE, Veelken R, Hilgers KF: Statin treatment reduces glomerular inflammation and podocyte damage in rat deoxycorticosterone-acetate-salt hypertension. J Hypertens. 2009, 27: 376-385. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32831997d6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Watts KL, Spiteri MA: Connective tissue growth factor expression and induction by transforming growth factor-beta is abrogated by simvastatin via a Rho signaling mechanism. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004, 287: L1323-L1332. 10.1152/ajplung.00447.2003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Grip O, Janciauskiene S: Atorvastatin reduces plasma levels of chemokine (CXCL10) in patients with Crohn’s disease. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e5263-10.1371/journal.pone.0005263.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Grip O, Janciauskiene S, Bredberg A: Use of atorvastatin as an anti-inflammatory treatment in Crohn’s disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2008, 155: 1085-1092.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Burke JP, Watson RW, Murphy M, Docherty NG, Coffey JC, O’Connell PR: Simvastatin impairs smad-3 phosphorylation and modulates transforming growth factor beta1-mediated activation of intestinal fibroblasts. Br J Surg. 2009, 96: 541-551. 10.1002/bjs.6577.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Abe Y, Murano M, Murano N, Morita E, Inoue T, Kawakami K, Ishida K, Kuramoto T, Kakimoto K, Okada T, Narabayashi K, Umegaki E, Higuchi K: Simvastatin attenuates intestinal fibrosis independent of the anti-inflammatory effect by promoting fibroblast/myofibroblast apoptosis in the regeneration/healing process from TNBS-induced colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2012, 57: 335-344. 10.1007/s10620-011-1879-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Haydont V, Bourgier C, Pocard M, Lusinchi A, Aigueperse J, Mathe D, Bourhis J, Vozenin-Brotons MC: Pravastatin Inhibits the Rho/CCN2/extracellular matrix cascade in human fibrosis explants and improves radiation-induced intestinal fibrosis in rats. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 5331-5340. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0625.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Ruster C, Wolf G: Angiotensin II as a morphogenic cytokine stimulating renal fibrogenesis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011, 22: 1189-1199. 10.1681/ASN.2010040384.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Siddesha JM, Valente AJ, Sakamuri SS, Yoshida T, Gardner JD, Somanna N, Takahashi C, Noda M, Chandrasekar B: Angiotensin II stimulates cardiac fibroblast migration via the differential regulation of matrixins and RECK. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013, 65: 9-18.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Bataller R, Gines P, Nicolas JM, Gorbig MN, Garcia-Ramallo E, Gasull X, Bosch J, Arroyo V, Rodes J: Angiotensin II induces contraction and proliferation of human hepatic stellate cells. Gastroenterology. 2000, 118: 1149-1156. 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70368-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Corey KE, Shah N, Misdraji J, Abu Dayyeh BK, Zheng H, Bhan AK, Chung RT: The effect of angiotensin-blocking agents on liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2009, 29: 748-753. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.01973.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Brown NJ: Contribution of aldosterone to cardiovascular and renal inflammation and fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013, 9: 459-469. 10.1038/nrneph.2013.110.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Daniel C: Blocking of angiotensin II is more than blocking of transforming growth factor-beta. Kidney Int. 2008, 74: 551-553. 10.1038/ki.2008.290.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Couluris M, Kinder BW, Xu P, Gross-King M, Krischer J, Panos RJ: Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with losartan: a pilot project. Lung. 2012, 190: 523-527. 10.1007/s00408-012-9410-z.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Diez J, Querejeta R, Lopez B, Gonzalez A, Larman M, Martinez Ubago JL: Losartan-dependent regression of myocardial fibrosis is associated with reduction of left ventricular chamber stiffness in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2002, 105: 2512-2517. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000017264.66561.3D.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. el-Agroudy AE, Hassan NA, Foda MA, Ismail AM, el-Sawy EA, Mousa O, Ghoneim MA: Effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker on plasma levels of TGF-beta 1 and interstitial fibrosis in hypertensive kidney transplant patients. Am J Nephrol. 2003, 23: 300-306. 10.1159/000072820.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. De BK, Bandyopadhyay K, Das TK, Das D, Biswas PK, Majumdar D, Mandal SK, Ray S, Dasgupta S: Portal pressure response to losartan compared with propranolol in patients with cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003, 98: 1371-1376. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07497.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Hirasawa K, Sato Y, Hosoda Y, Yamamoto T, Hanai H: Immunohistochemical localization of angiotensin II receptor and local renin-angiotensin system in human colonic mucosa. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002, 50: 275-282. 10.1177/002215540205000215.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Jaszewski R, Tolia V, Ehrinpreis MN, Bodzin JH, Peleman RR, Korlipara R, Weinstock JV: Increased colonic mucosal angiotensin I and II concentrations in Crohn’s colitis. Gastroenterology. 1990, 98: 1543-1548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Spencer AU, Yang H, Haxhija EQ, Wildhaber BE, Greenson JK, Teitelbaum DH: Reduced severity of a mouse colitis model with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. Dig Dis Sci. 2007, 52: 1060-1070. 10.1007/s10620-006-9124-2.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Sueyoshi R, Ignatoski KM, Daignault S, Okawada M, Teitelbaum DH: Angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor reduces colitis severity in an IL-10 knockout model. Dig Dis Sci. 2013, 58: 3165-3177. 10.1007/s10620-013-2825-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Lee C, Chun J, Hwang SW, Kang SJ, Im JP, Kim JS: Enalapril inhibits nuclear factor-kappaB signaling in intestinal epithelial cells and peritoneal macrophages and attenuates experimental colitis in mice. Life Sci. 2014, 95: 29-39. 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.11.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Byrnes JJ, Gross S, Ellard C, Connolly K, Donahue S, Picarella D: Effects of the ACE2 inhibitor GL1001 on acute dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice. Inflamm Res. 2009, 58: 819-827. 10.1007/s00011-009-0053-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Wengrower D, Zanninelli G, Pappo O, Latella G, Sestieri M, Villanova A, Faitelson Y, Pines M, Goldin E: Prevention of fibrosis in experimental colitis by captopril: the role of tgf-beta1. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004, 10: 536-545. 10.1097/00054725-200409000-00007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Wengrower D, Zanninelli G, Latella G, Necozione S, Metanes I, Israeli E, Lysy J, Pines M, Papo O, Goldin E: Losartan reduces trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid-induced colorectal fibrosis in rats. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012, 26: 33-39.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Gieling RG, Wallace K, Han YP: Interleukin-1 participates in the progression from liver injury to fibrosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009, 296: G1324-G1331. 10.1152/ajpgi.90564.2008.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Liu X: Inflammatory cytokines augments TGF-beta1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in A549 cells by up-regulating TbetaR-I. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2008, 65: 935-944. 10.1002/cm.20315.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Diaz JA, Booth AJ, Lu G, Wood SC, Pinsky DJ, Bishop DK: Critical role for IL-6 in hypertrophy and fibrosis in chronic cardiac allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. 2009, 9: 1773-1783. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02706.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Luckett-Chastain LR, Gallucci RM: Interleukin (IL)-6 modulates transforming growth factor-beta expression in skin and dermal fibroblasts from IL-6-deficient mice. Br J Dermatol. 2009, 161: 237-248. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09215.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Ito H: IL-6 and Crohn’s disease. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2003, 2: 125-130. 10.2174/1568010033484296.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Fichtner-Feigl S, Strober W, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ: Cytokines mediating the induction of chronic colitis and colitis-associated fibrosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2008, 1 (Suppl 1): S24-S27.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Raghu G, Brown KK, Costabel U, Cottin V, du Bois RM, Lasky JA, Thomeer M, Utz JP, Khandker RK, McDermott L, Fatenejad S: Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with etanercept: an exploratory, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 178: 948-955. 10.1164/rccm.200709-1446OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Corren J, Lemanske RF, Hanania NA, Korenblat PE, Parsey MV, Arron JR, Harris JM, Scheerens H, Wu LC, Su Z, Mosesova S, Eisner MD, Bohen SP, Matthews JG: Lebrikizumab treatment in adults with asthma. N Engl J Med. 2011, 365: 1088-1098. 10.1056/NEJMoa1106469.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Horton MR, Santopietro V, Mathew L, Horton KM, Polito AJ, Liu MC, Danoff SK, Lechtzin N: Thalidomide for the treatment of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012, 157: 398-406. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  161. Scaldaferri F, Vetrano S, Sans M, Arena V, Straface G, Stigliano E, Repici A, Sturm A, Malesci A, Panes J, Yla-Herttuala S, Fiocchi C, Danese S: VEGF-A links angiogenesis and inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2009, 136: 585-595. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.064.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Richeldi L, Costabel U, Selman M, Kim DS, Hansell DM, Nicholson AG, Brown KK, Flaherty KR, Noble PW, Raghu G, Brun M, Gupta A, Juhel N, Kluglich M, du Bois RM: Efficacy of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2011, 365: 1079-1087. 10.1056/NEJMoa1103690.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  163. Kugathasan S, Saubermann LJ, Smith L, Kou D, Itoh J, Binion DG, Levine AD, Blumberg RS, Fiocchi C: Mucosal T-cell immunoregulation varies in early and late inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2007, 56: 1696-1705. 10.1136/gut.2006.116467.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  164. Catania JM, Chen G, Parrish AR: Role of matrix metalloproteinases in renal pathophysiologies. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007, 292: F905-F911.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  165. Kim H, Oda T, Lopez-Guisa J, Wing D, Edwards DR, Soloway PD, Eddy AA: TIMP-1 deficiency does not attenuate interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001, 12: 736-748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Clutterbuck AL, Asplin KE, Harris P, Allaway D, Mobasheri A: Targeting matrix metalloproteinases in inflammatory conditions. Curr Drug Targets. 2009, 10: 1245-1254. 10.2174/138945009789753264.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  167. Kofla-Dlubacz A, Matusiewicz M, Krzystek-Korpacka M, Iwanczak B: Correlation of MMP-3 and MMP-9 with Crohn’s disease activity in children. Dig Dis Sci. 2012, 57: 706-712. 10.1007/s10620-011-1936-z.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  168. Faubion WA, Fletcher JG, O’Byrne S, Feagan BG, de Villiers WJ, Salzberg B, Plevy S, Proctor DD, Valentine JF, Higgins PD, Harris JM, Diehl L, Wright L, Tew GW, Luca D, Basu K, Keir ME: EMerging BiomARKers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (EMBARK) study identifies fecal calprotectin, serum MMP9, and serum IL-22 as a novel combination of biomarkers for Crohn’s disease activity: role of cross-sectional imaging. Am J Gastroenterol. 1891–1900, 2013: 108.Google Scholar
  169. Lakatos G, Hritz I, Varga MZ, Juhasz M, Miheller P, Cierny G, Tulassay Z, Herszenyi L: The impact of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in inflammatory bowel diseases. Dig Dis. 2012, 30: 289-295. 10.1159/000336995.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  170. Meijer MJ, Mieremet-Ooms MA, van der Zon AM, van Duijn W, van Hogezand RA, Sier CF, Hommes DW, Lamers CB, Verspaget HW: Increased mucosal matrix metalloproteinase-1, -2, -3 and -9 activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and the relation with Crohn's disease phenotype. Dig Liver Dis. 2007, 39: 733-739. 10.1016/j.dld.2007.05.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  171. Meijer MJ, Mieremet-Ooms MA, Sier CF, van Hogezand RA, Lamers CB, Hommes DW, Verspaget HW: Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors as prognostic indicators for diagnostic and surgical recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009, 15: 84-92. 10.1002/ibd.20581.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  172. Osman B, Akool el S, Doller A, Muller R, Pfeilschifter J, Eberhardt W: Differential modulation of the cytokine-induced MMP-9/TIMP-1 protease-antiprotease system by the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011, 81: 134-143. 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.09.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  173. Wang S, Wilkes MC, Leof EB, Hirschberg R: Noncanonical TGF-beta pathways, mTORC1 and Abl, in renal interstitial fibrogenesis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010, 298: F142-F149. 10.1152/ajprenal.00320.2009.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  174. Reinisch W, Panes J, Lemann M, Schreiber S, Feagan B, Schmidt S, Sturniolo GC, Mikhailova T, Alexeeva O, Sanna L, Haas T, Korom S, Mayer H: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of everolimus versus azathioprine and placebo to maintain steroid-induced remission in patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008, 103: 2284-2292. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02024.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  175. Massey DC, Bredin F, Parkes M: Use of sirolimus (rapamycin) to treat refractory Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2008, 57: 1294-1296. 10.1136/gut.2008.157297.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  176. Dumortier J, Lapalus MG, Guillaud O, Poncet G, Gagnieu MC, Partensky C, Scoazec JY: Everolimus for refractory Crohn’s disease: a case report. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008, 14: 874-877. 10.1002/ibd.20395.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  177. Ahmadian M, Suh JM, Hah N, Liddle C, Atkins AR, Downes M, Evans RM: PPARgamma signaling and metabolism: the good, the bad and the future. Nat Med. 2013, 19: 557-566.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  178. Rousseaux C, Desreumaux P: [The peroxisome-proliferator-activated gamma receptor and chronic inflammatory bowel disease (PPARgamma and IBD)]. J Soc Biol. 2006, 200: 121-131. 10.1051/jbio:2006015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  179. Aoki Y, Maeno T, Aoyagi K, Ueno M, Aoki F, Aoki N, Nakagawa J, Sando Y, Shimizu Y, Suga T, Arai M, Kurabayashi M: Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand, suppresses bleomycin-induced acute lung injury and fibrosis. Respiration. 2009, 77: 311-319. 10.1159/000168676.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  180. Wu M, Melichian DS, Chang E, Warner-Blankenship M, Ghosh AK, Varga J: Rosiglitazone abrogates bleomycin-induced scleroderma and blocks profibrotic responses through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. Am J Pathol. 2009, 174: 519-533. 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080574.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  181. Bertin B, Dubuquoy L, Colombel JF, Desreumaux P: PPAR-gamma in ulcerative colitis: a novel target for intervention. Curr Drug Targets. 2013, 14: 1501-1507. 10.2174/13894501113149990162.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  182. Kuhn A, Haust M, Ruland V, Weber R, Verde P, Felder G, Ohmann C, Gensch K, Ruzicka T: Effect of bosentan on skin fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis: a prospective, open-label, non-comparative trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010, 49: 1336-1345. 10.1093/rheumatology/keq077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  183. King TE, Brown KK, Raghu G, du Bois RM, Lynch DA, Martinez F, Valeyre D, Leconte I, Morganti A, Roux S, Behr J: BUILD-3: a randomized, controlled trial of bosentan in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011, 184: 92-99. 10.1164/rccm.201011-1874OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  184. Johnson LA, Luke A, Sauder K, Moons DS, Horowitz JC, Higgins PD: Intestinal fibrosis is reduced by early elimination of inflammation in a mouse model of IBD: impact of a “Top-Down” approach to intestinal fibrosis in mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012, 18: 460-471. 10.1002/ibd.21812.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  185. Govani SM, Stidham RW, Higgins PD: How early to take arms against a sea of troubles? The case for aggressive early therapy in Crohn’s disease to prevent fibrotic intestinal strictures. J Crohns Colitis. 2013, 7: 923-927. 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.06.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  186. Cosnes J, Cattan S, Blain A, Beaugerie L, Carbonnel F, Parc R, Gendre JP: Long-term evolution of disease behavior of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002, 8: 244-250. 10.1097/00054725-200207000-00002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  187. Goodman ZD, Becker RL, Pockros PJ, Afdhal NH: Progression of fibrosis in advanced chronic hepatitis C: evaluation by morphometric image analysis. Hepatology. 2007, 45: 886-894. 10.1002/hep.21595.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  188. Duarte-Rojo A, Altamirano JT, Feld JJ: Noninvasive markers of fibrosis: key concepts for improving accuracy in daily clinical practice. Ann Hepatol. 2012, 11: 426-439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. Ryan JD, Silverberg MS, Xu W, Graff LA, Targownik LE, Walker JR, Carr R, Clara I, Miller N, Rogala L, Bernstein CN: Predicting complicated Crohn’s disease and surgery: phenotypes, genetics, serology and psychological characteristics of a population-based cohort. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013, 38: 274-283. 10.1111/apt.12368.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  190. Jurickova I, Collins MH, Chalk C, Seese A, Bezold R, Lake K, von Allmen D, Frischer JS, Falcone RA, Trapnell BC, Denson LA: Paediatric Crohn disease patients with stricturing behaviour exhibit ileal granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibody production and reduced neutrophil bacterial killing and GM-CSF bioactivity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013, 172: 455-465. 10.1111/cei.12076.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  191. Maglinte DD, Bender GN, Heitkamp DE, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM: Multidetector-row helical CT enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003, 41: 249-262. 10.1016/S0033-8389(02)00115-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  192. Al-Hawary M, Zimmermann EM: A new look at Crohn’s disease: novel imaging techniques. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012, 28: 334-340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Adler J, Swanson SD, Schmiedlin-Ren P, Higgins PD, Golembeski CP, Polydorides AD, McKenna BJ, Hussain HK, Verrot TM, Zimmermann EM: Magnetization transfer helps detect intestinal fibrosis in an animal model of Crohn disease. Radiology. 2011, 259: 127-135. 10.1148/radiol.10091648.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  194. Griffin N, Goh V: Functional imaging of the bowel. Abdom Imaging. 2013, 38: 1203-1213. 10.1007/s00261-013-0030-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  195. Schirin-Sokhan R, Winograd R, Tischendorf S, Wasmuth HE, Streetz K, Tacke F, Trautwein C, Tischendorf JJ: Assessment of inflammatory and fibrotic stenoses in patients with Crohn’s disease using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computerized algorithm: a pilot study. Digestion. 2011, 83: 263-268. 10.1159/000321389.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  196. Stidham RW, Xu J, Johnson LA, Kim K, Moons DS, McKenna BJ, Rubin JM, Higgins PD: Ultrasound elasticity imaging for detecting intestinal fibrosis and inflammation in rats and humans with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2011, 141: 819-826. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.027.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  197. Brooker JC, Beckett CG, Saunders BP, Benson MJ: Long-acting steroid injection after endoscopic dilation of anastomotic Crohn’s strictures may improve the outcome: a retrospective case series. Endoscopy. 2003, 35: 333-337. 10.1055/s-2003-38145.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  198. Swaminath A, Lichtiger S: Dilation of colonic strictures by intralesional injection of infliximab in patients with Crohn’s colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008, 14: 213-216. 10.1002/ibd.20318.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bettenworth and Rieder; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement