Open Access

Matrix regulation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the role of enzymes

  • Deborah L Clarke1,
  • Alan M Carruthers1,
  • Tomas Mustelin2 and
  • Lynne A Murray1Email author
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair20136:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-1536-6-20

Received: 19 August 2013

Accepted: 13 November 2013

Published: 26 November 2013

Abstract

Repairing damaged tissues is an essential homeostatic mechanism that enables clearance of dead or damaged cells after injury, and the maintenance of tissue integrity. However, exaggeration of this process in the lung can lead to the development of fibrotic scar tissue. This is characterized by excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) components such as fibronectin, proteoglycans, hyaluronic acid, and interstitial collagens. After tissue injury, or a breakdown of tissue integrity, a cascade of events unfolds to maintain normal tissue homeostasis. Inflammatory mediators are released from injured epithelium, leading to both platelet activation and inflammatory cell migration. Inflammatory cells are capable of releasing multiple pro-inflammatory and fibrogenic mediators such as transforming growth factor (TGF)β and interleukin (IL)-13, which can trigger myofibroblast proliferation and recruitment. The myofibroblast population is also expanded as a result of epithelial cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and of the activation of resident fibroblasts, leading to ECM deposition and tissue remodeling. In the healthy lung, wound healing then proceeds to restore the normal architecture of the lung; however, fibrosis can develop when the wound is severe, the tissue injury persists, or the repair process becomes dysregulated. Understanding the processes regulating aberrant wound healing and the matrix in the chronic fibrotic lung disease idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), is key to identifying new treatments for this chronic debilitating disease. This review focuses primarily on the emerging role of enzymes in the lungs of patients with IPF. Elevated expression of a number of enzymes that can directly modulate the ECM has been reported, and recent data indicates that modulating the activity of these enzymes can have a downstream effect on fibrotic tissue remodeling.

Keywords

Fibrosis Matrix Chronic remodeling IPF

Review

Fibrotic matrix versus normal matrix

Multiple mechanisms and mediators contribute to an altered ECM in IPF. Components of the ECM are produced intracellularly by resident cells and secreted into the ECM where they aggregate with the existing matrix, and can exert a powerful influence over cell functions. The ECM is composed of an interlocking mesh of fibrous proteins and glycosaminoglycans, but the most abundant ECM component in most tissues is collagen. The principal collagens are the interstitial types I and III, which serve to form a fibrous network in the interstitium of tissues, and these are elevated in the parenchyma of patients with IPF [1]. Type IV collagen is the major component of the basement membrane. This matrix dysregulation and deposition in the lungs of patients with asthma can lead to a thickening in the basement membrane and directly contribute to disease via alterations in lung function [2]. In IPF, increased matrix leads to impaired gaseous exchange, and matrix components such as hyaluronic acid can further exacerbate the inflammatory milieu seen in the lung and contribute to disease progression [3] (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Schematic outlining the key effector cells that generate transforming growth factor (TGF)β and interleukin (IL)-13 and the enzymes associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Multiple cell types are found at sites of lung fibrosis. Many are direct producers of extracellular matrix (ECM), or indirectly promote the generation and deposition of aberrant matrix.

Matrix-producing cells: fibroblasts and myofibroblasts

The aberrant collagen deposition in the lungs of patients with IPF derives predominantly from activated fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. These cells are classically thought to derive from post-embryonic lung fibroblasts. However, accumulating data support a bone marrow-derived source for these cells, called fibrocytes. In experimental models, fibrocytes contributed to fibrotic remodeling both directly via ECM production and indirectly through the paracrine regulation of other fibrogenic cells [4, 5]. Fibroblasts may also derive from epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [6] or endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition [7], although their precise contribution to α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)-expressing cells remains controversial [8], and the contribution to disease progression in IPF is not firmly established.

Fibroblasts play central roles both in the maintenance of normal tissue function and in the wound healing response. The lung is a dynamic organ, often under varying degrees of motility and stress. By generating ECM, fibroblasts provide a scaffold for cells and a sink for mediators to be able to respond to the rapid changes in shear force. In the lung, fibroblasts are found in greatest numbers in the subepithelial layer of the conducting airways and the interstitium of the lung parenchyma, which puts them in a prime location to interact with the epithelial and endothelial cells.

Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts are metabolically active cells, capable of synthesizing, secreting, and degrading ECM components, including collagens, proteoglycans, tenascin, laminin, and fibronectin. The secretion of ECM proteins is closesly regulated. Moreover, fibroblasts generate matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), thus controlling tissue architecture and matrix turnover rates, and contributing to both the initiation and resolution phases following injury. The added contractile properties of myofibroblasts are also central to controlling wound healing as well as tissue architecture [9]. In vitro, fibroblast-to-myofibroblast trans-differentiation can be induced by transforming growth factor (TGF)β1 and it has been hypothesized that TGFβ1 found locally at sites of fibrosis trans-differentiate resident fibroblasts into myofibroblasts [10, 11]. Myofibroblasts are generally absent in lung parenchyma; however, in IPF, one of the hallmarks of disease is the presence of α-SMA-positive cells in and around fibroblastic foci.

IL-13 is another pro-fibrotic mediator that can elicit a number of fibroblast responses in vitro, as well as directly promoting fibrosis in vivo. Fibroblasts isolated from the lungs of patients with IPF exhibit an increase in IL-13 receptor expression for both IL-13Rα1 and IL-13Rα2 [12, 13]. Moreover, IPF fibroblasts are hyper-responsive to IL-13 stimulation in vitro, resulting in enhanced collagen production, differentiation to of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts, and increased TGFβ expression [13]. Both T cells and alternatively activated macrophages express IL-13 in the IPF lung [14]. Both of these cell types are found in increased numbers in IPF [15, 16]. In vivo mouse models have shown a pro-fibrotic role for IL-13Rα2 [17], classically thought of as a decoy receptor for IL-13. However, the relevance of this to human disease still needs to be determined.

Interestingly, fibroblasts isolated from fibrotic lung tissue are phenotypically different to non-fibrotic fibroblasts [1820]. Fibrotic fibroblasts exhibit altered responsiveness to growth factors and also enhanced chemokine receptor expression, suggesting a lower tolerance to exogenous stimuli. The progression and severity of IPF has also been closely associated with regions of fibroblast accumulation and proliferation, to the extent that these regions have become a reliable indicator of survival [1820]. The increased number of collagen-producing mesenchymal cells seen in these diseases suggests that these cells are either hyperproliferative and/or resistant to apoptosis, and both of these alterations have been observed in vitro[18, 19, 2123]. Collectively, IPF fibroblasts behave more like tumor cells, indicating that they have undergone epigenetic changes, or have transformed somehow from a normal lung fibroblast to a disease phenotype.

Remodeling of the matrix and control of matrix turnover

The turnover rates of matrix molecules and the proteases that degrade them are under control of an extensive network of cytokines, growth factors, proteases, lipid mediators, and mechanical forces. Fibroblasts synthesize a host of matrix components driving matrix deposition, and an abundant number of enzymes regulate matrix degradation including MMPs and serine proteases [24]. Collagen is also degraded both intracellularly and extracellularly, and the maintenance of tissue homeostasis is dependent on the regulation of matrix production and degradation within the tissue. In diseased tissue, it is clear that this finely balanced process is dysregulated, leading to tissue destruction and excessive matrix deposition. Mediators involved in this process leading to tissue fibrosis include locally released polypeptide growth factors (such as platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor) cytokines such as TGFβ and the interleukins, and cellular enzymes, which will be discussed below [25].

MMPs exert proteolytic activities on various proteins including many ECM components, and are thus central to ECM formation [26]. Numerous cell types in the lung are capable of expressing MMPs, including epithelium, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and macrophages. These cells have been shown to be elevated in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [26], as well as in IPF, where MMP1, MMP2 and MMP9 were shown to be co-localized to the epithelium surrounding fibrotic lesions, while increased TIMP2, was also observed suggesting that the MMP activity may be inhibited and that the fibrotic region is not degraded [27]. Other work has reported a role for MMP3, which is elevated in the IPF lung [28]. Overexpression of MMP3 leads to pulmonary fibrosis in the rat lung, while mice lacking MMP3 are protected [28]. In vitro work suggests a role for MMP3 in the activation of β-catenin signaling and the induction of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a process thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of IPF [29]. IL-13 can directly induce a number of pro-fibrotic MMPs, including MMP9 and MMP12 [30], and MMP7 [31], all of which are elevated in the lungs of patients with IPF. In addition to MMP3, pro-MMP7 is also elevated in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with IPF, and is thought to be produced by the hyperplastic alveolar and metaplastic bronchiolar epithelial cells, and activated locally in the lung [32]. Membrane type-1 MMP (MT1-MMP or MMP14) has also been reported to serve as a key effector of type I collagenolytic activity in pulmonary fibroblasts [33]. Other MMPs have been associated with the genetic risk of IPF. Polymorphisms of the MMP-1 promoter have been shown to potentially confer increased risk for IPF [34]. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and histopathologic evaluation of fibrosis and tissue destruction in IPF have been associated with pulmonary emphysema, with expression of MMP2, MMP7, MMP9, and MT1-MMP by fibroblasts of myofibroblastic foci being predominant in fibrosis [35].

Other protease activity in IPF

In addition to MMP dysregulation, other enzymes are known to play a role in IPF. Coagulation proteases, besides their important role in fibrin formation, are now well recognized to exert pro-fibrotic cellular effects via activation of protease-activated receptors (PARs) [36]. Mast cells co-cultured with lung fibroblasts become activated and release tryptase, which in turn promotes lung fibroblast proliferation via PAR-2 [36]. Tryptase-mediated stimulation of fibroblast proliferation occurs via activation of the protease-activated receptor PAR-2 [37], and more recently a PAR-2 dependency has also been demonstrated for tryptase induction of collagen and fibronectin synthesis by fibroblasts [38]. Furthermore, those authors hypothesized that the increase in PAR-2 expression observed in lung fibroblasts from patients with IPF could sensitize these cells to the effects of mast cell-derived tryptase [36, 38]. PAR-2 is elevated in IPF lungs, and is upregulated by TGFβ in lung fibroblasts [36]. PAR-2 has also recently been reported to play a role in aggravating pulmonary fibrosis. An absence of PAR-1 signaling in PAR-1 knockout mice conferred protection in a bleomycin model [39], and thrombin stimulation of proteoglycan expression is mediated by PAR-1 activation of TGFβ1RI [40]. More recently, a PAR-1 antagonist attenuated the expression of TGFβ1-promoted airway remodeling in ovalbumin-allergic rats [41]. PAR-2 has also recently been reported to play a role in aggravating pulmonary fibrosis. Mast cells co-cultured with lung fibroblasts become activated, and release tryptase, which in turn promotes lung fibroblast proliferation via PAR-2 [38].

Enzymes affecting matrix cross-linking

Enzymes such as transglutaminases (TGs) and lysyl oxidases (LOXs) are also reported to contribute to the pathogenesis of fibrosis through modification of the ECM. TGs are a family of nine enzymes that catalyze post-translational bonds between proteins via mechanism such as transamidation [42]. TG2 (also known as tissue transglutaminase) is the most abundant and widely expressed member of the TG family, being present in many cell types including fibroblasts, macrophages, smooth muscle cells, hepatocytes, red blood cells, cardiac myocytes, neurons, chondrocytes, and kidney cells [43]. TG2 is reported to promote tissue fibrosis through cross-linking extracellular collagen and fibronectin, making them more resistant to breakdown [44], but is known to exert multiple other functions that may promote fibrosis [4549]. TG2 has been shown to promote liver and kidney fibrosis, and to be elevated in patients with kidney disease [5054]. TG activity was reportedly increased in a rat model of pulmonary fibrosis [55]. In a mouse model of lung injury induced by bleomycin, bleomycin-induced epithelial damage was mediated through TG2, resulting in IL-6 release and the differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells, with subsequent inflammatory amplification in the lung [56]. In addition, the authors reported that fibroblast-derived TG2, acting downstream of TGFβ, was also important in the effector phase of fibrogenesis [56]. TG2 knockout mice were protected from bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, and TG2 expression and activity were increased in patients with IPF versus normal controls [57].

The LOX family is a family of five enzymes that facilitate the covalent cross-linking of type I collagens via catalysis of the oxidative deamination reaction between a lysyl or a hydroxylysyl residue [58, 59]. LOXL1 regulates collagen cross-linking and total collagen levels in angiotensin II-induced hypertension in rodents [60], has been associated with renal fibrosis [61], and when overexpressed, induces cardiac hypertrophy in mice [62]. LOXL2 was reported to increase collagen accumulation in breast and glioma tumors [63, 64], and has been associated with liver fibrosis [65], as well as IPF [64]. Treatment of mice with an anti-LOXL2 monoclonal antibody reduced the fibrotic burden in a model of cancer and lung fibrosis, in part via reduction in disease-associated fibroblasts. Anti-LOXL2 also led to reduced production of growth factors and cross-linked collagenous matrix, and also reduced TGFβ signaling, and thus those authors postulated that LOXL2 could potentially mediate fibroblast activation in vivo through its enzymatically catalyzed cross-linking of fibrillar collagen and corresponding increase in local matrix tension, resulting in activation of TGFβ1 signaling from the latent complex [64]. Targeting the cross-linking of collagen is an attractive therapeutic angle for patients with fibrosis, and indeed, agents blocking LOXL2 are now entering clinical trials in patients with IPF.

The role of the matrix in promoting fibroblast activation and inflammation

The ECM, as discussed, is a complex mixture of proteins, proteoglycans, and glycosaminoglycans, which supports cell and tissue architecture. However, the ECM can also alter cell adhesion, migration, proliferation/survival, and differentiation. Recent data have indicated that increased matrix stiffness increases fibroblast proliferation and contractility [66]. Fibrotic matrix is stiffer than normal lung matrix (6 to 20 kPa versus 1 kPa) [67]. Moreover, normal fibroblasts exhibit IPF cell properties when they are subjected to matrices with heightened stiffness, including increased differentiation to myofibroblasts, along with increased proliferation and resistance to apoptosis [6770]. Another key pro-fibrotic role for increased matrix stiffness is the promotion of latent TGFβ activation, whereas compliant matrices have lower levels of TGFβ activation [68]. Previous studies comparing normal and IPF fibroblasts have been conducted on glass or tissue culture plastic, and some of the underlying differences in cell responses may actually be due to the different types of matrix produced by the cells on different substrates. Therefore, future studies profiling discrete differences in matrix components are warranted.

ECM can also directly promote inflammation. Components of the ECM, namely hyaluronan and elastin, are reported to exhibit chemotactic activity on inflammatory cells, enhance phagocytic function, enhance adhesion of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), induce immune responses, and change gene expression profiles in inflammatory cells [71]. In the initial inflammatory phase of wound repair, the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronic acid is abundant, and acts as a promoter of early inflammation. However, failure to remove ECM degradation products from the site of tissue injury contributes to the unremitting inflammation and destruction observed in IPF. Clearance of hyaluronan fragments is thought to be dependent both on its receptor CD44 and on recognition by the host via Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 [3]. Hyaluronan-TLR2 and hyaluronan-TLR4 signals regulate both the innate inflammatory response as well as the epithelial cell integrity that is crucial for recovery from acute lung injury [3].

The ECM also plays a role in leukocyte adhesion. Adhesion of PMNs to ECM proteins has been shown to be important for their migration, and is thought to participate in PMN recruitment to sites of inflammation. Migration of PMNs through the parenchyma can be influenced by the composition of the ECM [72], with multiple studies demonstrating increased adherence of PMNs to surfaces coated with fibronectin and collagen [73]. ECM components such as fibronectin can also act as chemotactic agents for PMNs, suggesting that local rates of migration within tissues are potentially regulated by several different ECM components. Adhesion of PMNs to collagens is thought to be mediated via the integrin CD11b/CD18, found on PMNs [74], as shown by antibody-blocking experiments.

Matrix signaling: growth factors and integrins

It is now over three decades since the discovery of TGFβ [75], and its pleiotropic effects on cell growth, immune function, and proliferation have been well documented. Acting as a key pro-fibrotic molecule, TGFβ is a central stimulator of collagen production in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis [76]. The three mammalian isoforms of the TGFβ family, TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3 are secreted as pro-TGFβ forms, covalently bound to a pro-peptide (latent associated protein (LAP)β1, LAPβ2, and LAPβ3) in a complex referred to as the small latent complex (SLC). These structures prevent the engagement and agonism of the active molecule at TGFβ receptors. These complexes are targeted to structures within the ECM through latent TGF binding proteins (LTBPs) [77] by association with other ECM proteins such as fibronectin, fibrillin-1, and vitronectin. The majority of cells secrete TGF as an SLC with LTBP-1 [78, 79]. Thus, the large latent complex represents a storage depot of latent TGFβ for activation. Disruption of this process allows the release of TGFβ1, in a process known as TGFβ1 activation.

Activation of latent TGFβ can occur by multiple mechanisms, and is normally associated with proteolytic degradation of the LAP or an alteration of LAP confirmation to allow the activation of TGFβ; for example, bone morphogenetic protein-1, multiple MMPs, plasmin, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), tissue-type plasminogen activator, and thrombin [80]. Among proteolytic enzymes, uPA-mediated activation of plasmin is involved in the activation of latent TGFβ1 by proteolytic cleavage within the N-terminal region of LAP [81]. Binding of uPA to its receptor uPAR can trigger intracellular signal transduction via interaction with the α5β1 integrin [82], in addition to focusing plasmin production to release ECM factors and activate latent TGFβ1 [83, 84]. The transmembrane αv integrins have been shown to bind to and activate latent TGFβ1 and β3 by binding to arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) motifs. This RGD motif is absent in the LAP of TGFβ2, and consequently no integrin-mediated activation of TGFβ2 has been described to date. All the αv integrins, αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8, and the integrins α5β1 and α8β1 bind in this way.

Evidence for this major role for an integrin in TGFβ activation was first highlighted using β6-deficient mice that are unable to form the αvβ6 integrin [85] These mice exhibited an exaggerated inflammatory response similar to that seen with TGFβ1 and Smad3 knockout mice [86]. Subsequently, direct evidence of TGF activation in vivo was demonstrated for αvβ5 [68], αvβ6 [85,] and αvβ8 [87].

The integrins αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8 have been shown to activate latent TGFβ1 via two distinct modes of action [88]. In the case of αvβ8, which is expressed on normal epithelial cells, fetal fibroblasts, and dendritic and neuronal cells [87], it binds with high affinity to latent TGFβ1 by recognition of the RGD domain, and activation is mediated by anchoring of the molecule and its close proximity with MMP14, bringing about its proteolytic cleavage [89] Fibroblast-specific inducible β8 silencing reduced lung remodeling and TGFβ signaling in a chronic allergen challenge model [90], demonstrating a key in vivo function of this integrin.

In the case of αvβ3, αvβ5, and αvβ6, these integrins have been shown to activate latent TGFβ1 in a proteolysis-independent manner, by transmission of contractile cell forces within the LLC. These forces result in deformation of the latent complex to liberate active TGFβ1 [68, 91]. The importance of the role of LTBP-1 as a lever to decrease the threshold for TGFβ1 activation has recently been highlighted [92].

Current clinical approaches measuring and targeting the matrix

Despite our increasing understanding of the pathology driving IPF, and the key mechanisms involved in this disease, another area receiving much interest is how to measure matrix and collagen turnover clinically in patients, either to enable identification or to determine disease progression. HRCT can be used to clinically diagnose and determine the extent of lung fibrosis; however, repeated HRCT exposure to a patient who already has lung fibrosis may not be clinically feasible in the long term. Recently proteolytic generation of pathological and tissue-specific fragments of proteins has received increased attention [93] as a method of identifying potential markers of chronic lung disease in which matrix dysregulation is a key feature, such as COPD and IPF.

It has been reported that these protein fragments (also known as neoepitopes or protein fingerprints) are more accurate predictors than the unmodified intact proteins [93]. Examples include a type III collagen fragment generated by MMPs as a marker for generalized and liver fibrosis [92, 94], a type II collagen degradation product generated by MMPs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis [95], and a type I collagen fragment generated by cathepsin K as a diagnostic tool for measuring and monitoring bone resorption [96]. MMP9 and MMP12 have been associated with elastin degradation, and are implicated in chronic respiratory diseases such as IPF. Recent work in this field identified an elastin fragment, ELN-441, which is released by the action of MMP9 and MMP12 on elastin. This fragment was elevated in the serum of patients with IPF or COPD, and may represent a novel method for detecting ECM in IPF and other chronic lung diseases, following further clinical validation [97].

Another approach that is under development is using stable isotope labeling techniques in combination with ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry. A recent publication demonstrated the potential of monitoring collagen turnover in vivo using the intratracheal bleomycin mouse model [98]. Mice were challenged with bleomycin, and given deuterated drinking water 1 week prior to terminal endpoint, and the percentage of hydroxyproline that contained deuterateswater indicated the amount of new collagen [98]. The results indicated that new collagen generation closely mirrored cell proliferation, and the initial uptake of deuterated water peaked as early as 1 week post-bleomycin, when it subsequently declined, whereas histological fibrosis also peaked 1 week post-bleomycin but remained elevated throughout the remaining 5 weeks [98]. Collectively, these results indicated that the fibrosis observed in this model was initially induced by new collagen deposition and that the continued pathology was not due to constant collagen turnover, but more to maintenance of the synthesized ECM. Although the intratracheal bleomycin model has significant limitations and does not closely resemble clinical IPF, the model has provided insights in to some of the key pathways associated with IPF. However, if this phenomenon, of an initial burst of ECM generation that is then maintained resulting in chronic lung fibrosis, applies to IPF, future anti-fibrotic therapies should aim to target the maintenance of collagen and not the initial synthesis.

Conclusions

As described in this review, the matrix provides a number of pro-fibrotic mechanisms, including direct physiochemical activating properties, a sink for pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory mediators, and fostering of ECM-producing cell survival. Therefore, disrupting the aberrant matrix that has accumulated in the IPF lung may result in a number of pathways being inhibited, and might provide significant improvements in gas exchange in the lung, resulting in considerable improvement in patient mortality and morbidity.

Abbreviations

BMP: 

Bone morphogenic protein

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ECM: 

Extracellular matrix

HRCT: 

High-resolution computed tomography

IPF: 

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

LOX: 

Lysyl oxidase

LTBP: 

Latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein

MMP: 

Matrix metalloproteinase

PAR: 

Protease-activated receptor

PMN: 

Polymorphonuclear neutrophil

SMA: 

Smooth muscle actin

TG: 

Transglutaminase

TGF: 

Transforming growth factor

TIMP: 

Tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MedImmune Ltd
(2)
MedImmune LLC

References

  1. Laurent GJ, Harrison NK, McAnulty RJ: The regulation of collagen production in normal lung and during interstitial lung disease. Postgrad Med J. 1988, 64 (Suppl 4): 26-34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Royce SG, Cheng V, Samuel CS, Tang ML: The regulation of fibrosis in airway remodeling in asthma. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012, 351 (2): 167-175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jiang D, Liang J, Fan J, Yu S, Chen S, Luo Y, Prestwich GD, Mascarenhas MM, Garg HG, Quinn DA, Homer RJ, Goldstein DR, Bucala R, Lee PJ, Medzhitov R, Noble PW: Regulation of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan. Nat Med. 2005, 11 (11): 1173-1179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Reilkoff RA, Bucala R, Herzog EL: Fibrocytes: emerging effector cells in chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011, 11 (6): 427-435.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Quan TE, Cowper SE, Bucala R: The role of circulating fibrocytes in fibrosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006, 8 (2): 145-150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim KK, Wei Y, Szekeres C, Kugler MC, Wolters PJ, Hill ML, Frank JA, Brumwell AN, Wheeler SE, Kreidberg JA, Chapman HA: Epithelial cell alpha3beta1 integrin links beta-catenin and Smad signaling to promote myofibroblast formation and pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119 (1): 213-224.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hashimoto N, Phan SH, Imaizumi K, Matsuo M, Nakashima H, Kawabe T, Shimokata K, Hasegawa Y: Endothelial-mesenchymal transition in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2009, 43 (2): 161-172.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rock JR, Barkauskas CE, Cronce MJ, Xue Y, Harris JR, Liang J, Noble PW, Hogan BL: Multiple stromal populations contribute to pulmonary fibrosis without evidence for epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108 (52): E1475-E1483.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ohta K, Mortenson RL, Clark RA, Hirose N, King TE: Immunohistochemical identification and characterization of smooth muscle-like cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995, 152 (5 Pt 1): 1659-1665.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers RC, Leoni P, Kaminski N, Laurent GJ, Heller RA: Global expression profiling of fibroblast responses to transforming growth factor-beta1 reveals the induction of inhibitor of differentiation-1 and provides evidence of smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching. Am J Pathol. 2003, 162 (2): 533-546.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Desmouliere A, Geinoz A, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1993, 122 (1): 103-111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jakubzick C, Choi ES, Kunkel SL, Evanoff H, Martinez FJ, Puri RK, Flaherty KR, Toews GB, Colby TV, Kazerooni EA, Gross BH, Travis WD, Hogaboam CM: Augmented pulmonary IL-4 and IL-13 receptor subunit expression in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. J Clin Pathol. 2004, 57 (5): 477-486.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Murray LA, Argentieri RL, Farrell FX, Bracht M, Sheng H, Whitaker B, Beck H, Tsui P, Cochlin K, Evanoff HL, Hogaboam CM, Das AM: Hyper-responsiveness of IPF/UIP fibroblasts: interplay between TGFbeta1, IL-13 and CCL2. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008, 40 (10): 2174-2182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hancock A, Armstrong L, Gama R, Millar A: Production of interleukin 13 by alveolar macrophages from normal and fibrotic lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998, 18 (1): 60-65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Murray LA, Chen Q, Kramer MS, Hesson DP, Argentieri RL, Peng X, Gulati M, Homer RJ, Russell T, van Rooijen N, Elias JA, Hogaboam CM, Herzog EL: TGF-beta driven lung fibrosis is macrophage dependent and blocked by serum amyloid P. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011, 43 (1): 154-162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Reilkoff RA, Peng H, Murray LA, Peng X, Russell T, Montgomery R, Feghali-Bostwick C, Shaw A, Homer RJ, Gulati M, Mathur A, Elias JA, Herzog EL: Semaphorin 7a + regulatory T cells are associated with progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and are implicated in transforming growth factor-beta1-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013, 187 (2): 180-188.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fichtner-Feigl S, Strober W, Kawakami K, Puri RK, Kitani A: IL-13 signaling through the IL-13alpha(2) receptor is involved in induction of TGF-beta(1) production and fibrosis. Nat Med. 2005, 12 (1): 99-106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Moodley YP, Scaffidi AK, Misso NL, Keerthisingam C, McAnulty RJ, Laurent GJ, Mutsaers SE, Thompson PJ, Knight DA: Fibroblasts isolated from normal lungs and those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis differ in interleukin-6/gp130-mediated cell signaling and proliferation. Am J Pathol. 2003, 163 (1): 345-354.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Scaffidi AK, Mutsaers SE, Moodley YP, McAnulty RJ, Laurent GJ, Thompson PJ, Knight DA: Oncostatin M stimulates proliferation, induces collagen production and inhibits apoptosis of human lung fibroblasts. Br J Pharmacol. 2002, 136 (5): 793-801.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Keerthisingam CB, Jenkins RG, Harrison NK, Hernandez-Rodriguez NA, Booth H, Laurent GJ, Hart SL, Foster ML, McAnulty RJ: Cyclooxygenase-2 deficiency results in a loss of the anti-proliferative response to transforming growth factor-beta in human fibrotic lung fibroblasts and promotes bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Am J Pathol. 2001, 158 (4): 1411-1422.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacoby DB, Gleich GJ, Fryer AD: Human eosinophil major basic protein is an endogenous allosteric antagonist at the inhibitory muscarinic M2 receptor. J Clin Invest. 1993, 91 (4): 1314-1318.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tanaka T, Yoshimi M, Maeyama T, Hagimoto N, Kuwano K, Hara N: Resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis in human lung fibroblast. Eur Respir J. 2002, 20 (2): 359-368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramos C, Montano M, Garcia-Alvarez J, Ruiz V, Uhal BD, Selman M, Pardo A: Fibroblasts from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and normal lungs differ in growth rate, apoptosis, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases expression. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001, 24 (5): 591-598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mutsaers SE, Bishop JE, McGrouther G, Laurent GJ: Mechanisms of tissue repair: from wound healing to fibrosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997, 29 (1): 5-17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wynn TA: Integrating mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. J Exp Med. 2011, 208 (7): 1339-1350.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Demedts IK, Brusselle GG, Bracke KR, Vermaelen KY, Pauwels RA: Matrix metalloproteinases in asthma and COPD. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005, 5 (3): 257-263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fukuda Y, Ishizaki M, Kudoh S, Kitaichi M, Yamanaka N: Localization of matrix metalloproteinases-1, -2, and -9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 in interstitial lung diseases. Lab Invest. 1998, 78 (6): 687-698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yamashita CM, Dolgonos L, Zemans RL, Young SK, Robertson J, Briones N, Suzuki T, Campbell MN, Gauldie J, Radisky DC, Riches DW, Yu G, Kaminski N, McCulloch CA, Downey GP: Matrix metalloproteinase 3 is a mediator of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2011, 179 (4): 1733-1745.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen QK, Lee K, Radisky DC, Nelson CM: Extracellular matrix proteins regulate epithelial-mesenchymal transition in mammary epithelial cells. Differentiation. 2013, 86 (3): 126-32.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lanone S, Zheng T, Zhu Z, Liu W, Lee CG, Ma B, Chen Q, Homer RJ, Wang J, Rabach LA, Rabach ME, Shipley JM, Shapiro SD, Senior RM, Elias JA: Overlapping and enzyme-specific contributions of matrix metalloproteinases-9 and -12 in IL-13-induced inflammation and remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110 (4): 463-474.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wadsworth SJ, Atsuta R, McIntyre JO, Hackett TL, Singhera GK, Dorscheid DR: IL-13 and TH2 cytokine exposure triggers matrix metalloproteinase 7-mediated Fas ligand cleavage from bronchial epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010, 126 (2): 366-374. 374.e1-8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fujishima S, Shiomi T, Yamashita S, Yogo Y, Nakano Y, Inoue T, Nakamura M, Tasaka S, Hasegawa N, Aikawa N, Ishizaka A, Okada Y: Production and activation of matrix metalloproteinase 7 (matrilysin 1) in the lungs of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010, 134 (8): 1136-1142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rowe RG, Keena D, Sabeh F, Willis AL, Weiss SJ: Pulmonary fibroblasts mobilize the membrane-tethered matrix metalloprotease, MT1-MMP, to destructively remodel and invade interstitial type I collagen barriers. Am J Physiol. 2011, 301 (5): L683-L692.Google Scholar
  34. Checa M, Ruiz V, Montano M, Velazquez-Cruz R, Selman M, Pardo A: MMP-1 polymorphisms and the risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Hum Genet. 2008, 124 (5): 465-472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogliani P, Mura M, Mattia P, Ferlosio A, Farinelli G, Mariotta S, Graziano P, Pezzuto G, Ricci A, Saltini C, Orlandi A: HRCT and histopathological evaluation of fibrosis and tissue destruction in IPF associated with pulmonary emphysema. Respir Med. 2008, 102 (12): 1753-1761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wygrecka M, Kwapiszewska G, Jablonska E, von Gerlach S, Henneke I, Zakrzewicz D, Guenther A, Preissner KT, Markart P: Role of protease-activated receptor-2 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011, 183 (12): 1703-1714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Akers IA, Parsons M, Hill MR, Hollenberg MD, Sanjar S, Laurent GJ, McAnulty RJ: Mast cell tryptase stimulates human lung fibroblast proliferation via protease-activated receptor-2. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000, 278 (1): L193-L201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wygrecka M, Dahal BK, Kosanovic D, Petersen F, Taborski B, von Gerlach S, Didiasova M, Zakrzewicz D, Preissner KT, Schermuly RT, Markart P: Mast cells and fibroblasts work in concert to aggravate pulmonary fibrosis: role of transmembrane SCF and the PAR-2/PKC-alpha/Raf-1/p44/42 signaling pathway. Am J Pathol. 2013, 182 (6): 2094-2108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Howell DC, Johns RH, Lasky JA, Shan B, Scotton CJ, Laurent GJ, Chambers RC: Absence of proteinase-activated receptor-1 signaling affords protection from bleomycin-induced lung inflammation and fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2005, 166 (5): 1353-1365.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Burch ML, Ballinger ML, Yang SN, Getachew R, Itman C, Loveland K, Osman N, Little PJ: Thrombin stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis in vascular smooth muscle is mediated by protease-activated receptor-1 transactivation of the transforming growth factor beta type I receptor. J Biol Chem. 2010, 285 (35): 26798-26805.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu W, Bi M, Liu Y, Wang Y, Pan F, Qiu L, Guo A, Lv H, Yao P, Zhang N, Wang P: Thrombin promotes airway remodeling via protease-activated receptor-1 and transforming growth factor-beta1 in ovalbumin-allergic rats. Inhal Toxicol. 2013, 25 (10): 577-586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lorand L, Graham RM: Transglutaminases: crosslinking enzymes with pleiotropic functions. Nat Rev. 2003, 4 (2): 140-156.Google Scholar
  43. Iismaa SE, Mearns BM, Lorand L, Graham RM: Transglutaminases and disease: lessons from genetically engineered mouse models and inherited disorders. Physiol Rev. 2009, 89 (3): 991-1023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Verderio EA, Johnson T, Griffin M: Tissue transglutaminase in normal and abnormal wound healing: review article. Amino acids. 2004, 26 (4): 387-404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mhaouty-Kodja S: Ghalpha/tissue transglutaminase 2: an emerging G protein in signal transduction. Biol Cell. 2004, 96 (5): 363-367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Akimov SS, Krylov D, Fleischman LF, Belkin AM: Tissue transglutaminase is an integrin-binding adhesion coreceptor for fibronectin. J Cell Biol. 2000, 148 (4): 825-838.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mehta K, Fok JY, Mangala LS: Tissue transglutaminase: from biological glue to cell survival cues. Front Biosci. 2006, 11: 173-185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephens P, Grenard P, Aeschlimann P, Langley M, Blain E, Errington R, Kipling D, Thomas D, Aeschlimann D: Crosslinking and G-protein functions of transglutaminase 2 contribute differentially to fibroblast wound healing responses. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117 (Pt 15): 3389-3403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Akimov SS, Belkin AM: Cell surface tissue transglutaminase is involved in adhesion and migration of monocytic cells on fibronectin. Blood. 2001, 98 (5): 1567-1576.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Grenard P, Bresson-Hadni S, El Alaoui S, Chevallier M, Vuitton DA, Ricard-Blum S: Transglutaminase-mediated cross-linking is involved in the stabilization of extracellular matrix in human liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2001, 35 (3): 367-375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Qiu JF, Zhang ZQ, Chen W, Wu ZY: Cystamine ameliorates liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride via inhibition of tissue transglutaminase. World J Gastroenterol. 2007, 13 (32): 4328-4332.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnson TS, Griffin M, Thomas GL, Skill J, Cox A, Yang B, Nicholas B, Birckbichler PJ, Muchaneta-Kubara C, Meguid El Nahas A: The role of transglutaminase in the rat subtotal nephrectomy model of renal fibrosis. J Clin Investig. 1997, 99 (12): 2950-2960.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Shweke N, Boulos N, Jouanneau C, Vandermeersch S, Melino G, Dussaule JC, Chatziantoniou C, Ronco P, Boffa JJ: Tissue transglutaminase contributes to interstitial renal fibrosis by favoring accumulation of fibrillar collagen through TGF-beta activation and cell infiltration. Am J Pathol. 2008, 173 (3): 631-642.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Huang L, Haylor JL, Hau Z, Jones RA, Vickers ME, Wagner B, Griffin M, Saint RE, Coutts IG, El Nahas AM, Johnson TS: Transglutaminase inhibition ameliorates experimental diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2009, 76 (4): 383-394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Griffin M, Smith LL, Wynne J: Changes in transglutaminase activity in an experimental model of pulmonary fibrosis induced by paraquat. Br J Exp Pathol. 1979, 60 (6): 653-661.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Oh K, Park HB, Byoun OJ, Shin DM, Jeong EM, Kim YW, Kim YS, Melino G, Kim IG, Lee DS: Epithelial transglutaminase 2 is needed for T cell interleukin-17 production and subsequent pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in bleomycin-treated mice. J Exp Med. 2011, 208 (8): 1707-1719.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Olsen KC, Sapinoro RE, Kottmann RM, Kulkarni AA, Iismaa SE, Johnson GV, Thatcher TH, Phipps RP, Sime PJ: Transglutaminase 2 and its role in pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011, 184 (6): 699-707.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rucker RB, Murray J: Cross-linking amino acids in collagen and elastin. Am J Clin Nutr. 1978, 31 (7): 1221-1236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yamauchi M, Shiiba M: Lysine hydroxylation and cross-linking of collagen. Meth Mol Biol (Clifton, N J). 2008, 446: 95-108.Google Scholar
  60. Gonzalez GE, Rhaleb NE, Nakagawa P, Liao TD, Liu Y, Leung P, Dai X, Yang XP, Carretero OA: N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline reduces cardiac collagen cross-linking and inflammation in angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats. Clin Sci (Lond). 2014, 126 (1): 85-94.Google Scholar
  61. Phua YL, Martel N, Pennisi DJ, Little MH, Wilkinson L: Distinct sites of renal fibrosis in Crim1 mutant mice arise from multiple cellular origins. J Pathol. 2013, 229 (5): 685-696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ohmura H, Yasukawa H, Minami T, Sugi Y, Oba T, Nagata T, Kyogoku S, Ohshima H, Aoki H, Imaizumi T: Cardiomyocyte-specific transgenic expression of lysyl oxidase-like protein-1 induces cardiac hypertrophy in mice. Hypertens Res. 2012, 35 (11): 1063-1068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Akiri G, Sabo E, Dafni H, Vadasz Z, Kartvelishvily Y, Gan N, Kessler O, Cohen T, Resnick M, Neeman M, Neufeld G: Lysyl oxidase-related protein-1 promotes tumor fibrosis and tumor progression in vivo. Cancer Res. 2003, 63 (7): 1657-1666.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Barry-Hamilton V, Spangler R, Marshall D, McCauley S, Rodriguez HM, Oyasu M, Mikels A, Vaysberg M, Ghermazien H, Wai C, Garcia CA, Velayo AC, Jorgensen B, Biermann D, Tsai D, Green J, Zaffryar-Eilot S, Holzer A, Ogg S, Thai D, Neufeld G, Van Vlasselaer P, Smith V: Allosteric inhibition of lysyl oxidase-like-2 impedes the development of a pathologic microenvironment. Nat Med. 2010, 16 (9): 1009-1017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Vadasz Z, Kessler O, Akiri G, Gengrinovitch S, Kagan HM, Baruch Y, Izhak OB, Neufeld G: Abnormal deposition of collagen around hepatocytes in Wilson's disease is associated with hepatocyte specific expression of lysyl oxidase and lysyl oxidase like protein-2. J Hepatol. 2005, 43 (3): 499-507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Marinkovic A, Liu F, Tschumperlin DJ: Matrices of physiologic stiffness potently inactivate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013, 48 (4): 422-430.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Liu F, Mih JD, Shea BS, Kho AT, Sharif AS, Tager AM, Tschumperlin DJ: Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression. J Cell Biol. 2010, 190 (4): 693-706.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wipff PJ, Rifkin DB, Meister JJ, Hinz B: Myofibroblast contraction activates latent TGF-beta1 from the extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol. 2007, 179 (6): 1311-1323.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Marinkovic A, Mih JD, Park JA, Liu F, Tschumperlin DJ: Improved throughput traction microscopy reveals pivotal role for matrix stiffness in fibroblast contractility and TGF-beta responsiveness. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012, 303 (3): L169-L180.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Lakins JN, Rozenberg GI, Gefen A, Reinhart-King CA, Margulies SS, Dembo M, Boettiger D, Hammer DA, Weaver VM: Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005, 8 (3): 241-254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Adair-Kirk TL, Senior RM: Fragments of extracellular matrix as mediators of inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008, 40 (6–7): 1101-1110.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Kuntz RM, Saltzman WM: Neutrophil motility in extracellular matrix gels: mesh size and adhesion affect speed of migration. Biophys J. 1997, 72 (3): 1472-1480.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Bohnsack JF, Akiyama SK, Damsky CH, Knape WA, Zimmerman GA: Human neutrophil adherence to laminin in vitro. Evidence for a distinct neutrophil integrin receptor for laminin. J Exp Med. 1990, 171 (4): 1221-1237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Walzog B, Schuppan D, Heimpel C, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Gaehtgens P, Ley K: The leukocyte integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) contributes to binding of human granulocytes to collagen. Exp Cell Res. 1995, 218 (1): 28-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Roberts AB, Anzano MA, Lamb LC, Smith JM, Sporn MB: New class of transforming growth factors potentiated by epidermal growth factor: isolation from non-neoplastic tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981, 78 (9): 5339-5343.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Roberts AB, Sporn MB, Assoian RK, Smith JM, Roche NS, Wakefield LM, Heine UI, Liotta LA, Falanga V, Kehrl JH: Transforming growth factor type beta: rapid induction of fibrosis and angiogenesis in vivo and stimulation of collagen formation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986, 83 (12): 4167-4171.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Annes JP, Munger JS, Rifkin DB: Making sense of latent TGFbeta activation. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116 (Pt 2): 217-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Dallas SL, Park-Snyder S, Miyazono K, Twardzik D, Mundy GR, Bonewald LF: Characterization and autoregulation of latent transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta) complexes in osteoblast-like cell lines. Production of a latent complex lacking the latent TGF beta-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269 (9): 6815-6821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Miyazono K, Olofsson A, Colosetti P, Heldin CH: A role of the latent TGF-beta 1-binding protein in the assembly and secretion of TGF-beta 1. EMBO J. 1991, 10 (5): 1091-1101.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Jenkins G: The role of proteases in transforming growth factor-beta activation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008, 40 (6–7): 1068-1078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Horiguchi M, Ota M, Rifkin DB: Matrix control of transforming growth factor-beta function. J Biochem. 2012, 152 (4): 321-329.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Chaurasia P, Aguirre-Ghiso JA, Liang OD, Gardsvoll H, Ploug M, Ossowski L: A region in urokinase plasminogen receptor domain III controlling a functional association with alpha5beta1 integrin and tumor growth. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (21): 14852-14863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Lyons RM, Gentry LE, Purchio AF, Moses HL: Mechanism of activation of latent recombinant transforming growth factor beta 1 by plasmin. J Cell Biol. 1990, 110 (4): 1361-1367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Odekon LE, Blasi F, Rifkin DB: Requirement for receptor-bound urokinase in plasmin-dependent cellular conversion of latent TGF-beta to TGF-beta. J Cell Physiol. 1994, 158 (3): 398-407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Munger JS, Harpel JG, Giancotti FG, Rifkin DB: Interactions between growth factors and integrins: latent forms of transforming growth factor-beta are ligands for the integrin alphavbeta1. Mol Biol Cell. 1998, 9 (9): 2627-2638.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Bonniaud P, Kolb M, Galt T, Robertson J, Robbins C, Stampfli M, Lavery C, Margetts PJ, Roberts AB, Gauldie J: Smad3 null mice develop airspace enlargement and are resistant to TGF-beta-mediated pulmonary fibrosis. J Immunol. 2004, 173 (3): 2099-2108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Araya J, Cambier S, Morris A, Finkbeiner W, Nishimura SL: Integrin-mediated transforming growth factor-beta activation regulates homeostasis of the pulmonary epithelial-mesenchymal trophic unit. Am J Pathol. 2006, 169 (2): 405-415.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Wipff PJ, Hinz B: Integrins and the activation of latent transforming growth factor beta1 - an intimate relationship. Eur J Cell Biol. 2008, 87 (8–9): 601-615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Mu D, Cambier S, Fjellbirkeland L, Baron JL, Munger JS, Kawakatsu H, Sheppard D, Broaddus VC, Nishimura SL: The integrin alpha(v)beta8 mediates epithelial homeostasis through MT1-MMP-dependent activation of TGF-beta1. J Cell Biol. 2002, 157 (3): 493-507.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Kitamura H, Cambier S, Somanath S, Barker T, Minagawa S, Markovics J, Goodsell A, Publicover J, Reichardt L, Jablons D, Wolters P, Hill A, Marks JD, Lou J, Pittet JF, Gauldie J, Baron JL, Nishimura SL: Mouse and human lung fibroblasts regulate dendritic cell trafficking, airway inflammation, and fibrosis through integrin alphavbeta8-mediated activation of TGF-beta. J Clin Investig. 2011, 121 (7): 2863-2875.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Sheppard D: Integrin-mediated activation of latent transforming growth factor beta. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005, 24 (3): 395-402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Buscemi L, Ramonet D, Klingberg F, Formey A, Smith-Clerc J, Meister JJ, Hinz B: The single-molecule mechanics of the latent TGF-beta1 complex. Curr Biol. 2011, 21 (24): 2046-2054.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Karsdal MA, Henriksen K, Leeming DJ, Mitchell P, Duffin K, Barascuk N, Klickstein L, Aggarwal P, Nemirovskiy O, Byrjalsen I, Qvist P, Bay-Jensen AC, Dam EB, Madsen SH, Christiansen C: Biochemical markers and the FDA Critical Path: how biomarkers may contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and provide unique and necessary tools for drug development. Biomarkers. 2009, 14 (3): 181-202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Veidal SS, Vassiliadis E, Barascuk N, Zhang C, Segovia-Silvestre T, Klickstein L, Larsen MR, Qvist P, Christiansen C, Vainer B, Karsdal MA: Matrix metalloproteinase-9-mediated type III collagen degradation as a novel serological biochemical marker for liver fibrogenesis. Liver Int. 2010, 30 (9): 1293-1304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Bay-Jensen AC, Liu Q, Byrjalsen I, Li Y, Wang J, Pedersen C, Leeming DJ, Dam EB, Zheng Q, Qvist P, Karsdal MA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAs) for metalloproteinase derived type II collagen neoepitope, CIIM–increased serum CIIM in subjects with severe radiographic osteoarthritis. Clin Biochem. 2011, 44 (5–6): 423-429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Zhen EY, Brittain IJ, Laska DA, Mitchell PG, Sumer EU, Karsdal MA, Duffin KL: Characterization of metalloprotease cleavage products of human articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58 (8): 2420-2431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Skjot-Arkil H, Clausen RE, Nguyen QH, Wang Y, Zheng Q, Martinez FJ, Hogaboam CM, Han M, Klickstein LB, Larsen MR, Nawrocki A, Leeming DJ, Karsdal MA: Measurement of MMP-9 and -12 degraded elastin (ELM) provides unique information on lung tissue degradation. BMC Pulm Med. 2012, 12: 34.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Blaauboer ME, Emson CL, Verschuren L, van Erk M, Turner SM, Everts V, Hanemaaijer R, Stoop R: Novel combination of collagen dynamics analysis and transcriptional profiling reveals fibrosis-relevant genes and pathways. Matrix Biol. 2013, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Clarke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement