From: Interstitial fluid: the overlooked component of the tumor microenvironment?
Method | How performed | What was sampled | Advantages | Disadvantages | Remarks | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glass capillaries | Insertion by blunt dissection in vivo | Fluid from tumor periphery or sectioned surface | In vivo native fluid | Bleeding and inflammation, cellular disruption | High level of intracellular enzymes in isolated fluid | [40] |
Implantable chambers | Chronically implanted | Fluid draining from central part of tumor | In vivo native fluid, continuous and repeated sampling | Inflammation in early phases, scar formation | Requires chronic restraining of animal | [41] |
Implanted wicks | Implanted acutely or chronically | Fluid absorbed into wicks during implantation | In vivo, native fluid | Bleeding and inflammation, cellular disruption | Chronic implantation more representative than acute | [43] |
Microdialysis | Insertion of semipermeable membrane | Substances diffusing across membrane | In vivo continuous and repeated sampling | Inflammation, incomplete recovery, dilute fluid | Recovery especially low for macromolecules | Reviewed in [45] |
Capillary ultrafiltration | Negative pressure applied to semipermeable membrane | Substances transported by bulk flow across membrane | In vivo continuous and repeated sampling | Inflammation, incomplete recovery | Recovery especially low for macromolecules | [60] |
Tissue centrifugation | Exposure of excised tissue to increased G-force | Fluid from tumor periphery or bone marrow | Native fluid | Ex vivo single samples | Composition validated by extracellular tracers | |
Tissue elution | Elution of minced tissue | Substances dissolved in elution buffer | Technically easy | Ex vivo single samples, dilute fluid | Contamination by intracellular proteins likely | [67] |